Zum Inhalt
Menü

Pumping Chambers for SFRS

FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH · Darmstadt, Hessen

Aktenzeichen 35/2600025670FAIRveröffentlicht 11.09.2025LieferleistungenVerhandlungsverfahren mit Teilnahmewettbewerb

Frist im Verfahrenseit 558 Tagen abgelaufen

Dieses Verfahren ist abgeschlossen oder älter. Die Seite bleibt zur Information erreichbar.

Geplant · Neuausschreibung möglich

Vertrag endete voraussichtlich am

bereits erreicht · aus Vertragsdatum und Laufzeit errechnet

Endet ein Vertrag, schreibt die Vergabestelle die Leistung oft neu aus. Merken Sie den Vertrag vor: Wir erinnern Sie per E-Mail vor dem Vertragsende und melden, wenn dieselbe Vergabestelle eine ähnliche Leistung ausschreibt.

Vormerkenmit kostenlosem Konto

Verlängerungen sind nicht eingerechnet. Ob und wann neu ausgeschrieben wird, entscheidet die Vergabestelle. Die Erkennung einer Neuausschreibung ist eine Schätzung. Weitere auslaufende Verträge

Auf einen Blick

Art des Auftrags
Lieferleistungen
Geschätzter Wert
keine Angabe
Laufzeit
12 Monate
Lose
1
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein
Ort der Leistung
Darmstadt64291, Hessen
Einreichung
keine Angabe

Schnellprüfung für Bieter

  • Unterlagen frei zugänglichkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Einreichung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Nebenangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Mehrere Hauptangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Laut Auftraggeber für KMU geeignetkeine Angabe
  • Sicherheiten verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Teilnahme vorbehalten (z. B. Werkstätten)keine Angabe
  • E-Rechnung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Vertraulichkeitserklärung verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Auktionnein
  • Aus EU-Mitteln finanziertnein
  • Wiederkehrender Auftragkeine Angabe

Einordnungvon uns ausgewertet

Wer darf bieten?

Zuerst bewerben sich Unternehmen mit einem Teilnahmeantrag, danach geben ausgewählte Bewerber Angebote ab.

Wird verhandelt?

Über Inhalt und Preis der Angebote kann verhandelt werden. Oft behält sich die Vergabestelle vor, den Zuschlag ohne Verhandlung zu erteilen: Das erste Angebot sollte dann schon das letzte sein.

Was jetzt zu tun ist

Kein Angebot mehr möglich. Wer gewonnen hat und wie viele Angebote eingingen, steht unter Zuschläge; für Folgeaufträge lohnt der Blick auf Laufzeit und Vergabestelle.

Das Verfahren ist abgeschlossen; diese Meldung nennt das Ergebnis.

Bei dieser Vergabestelle vergehen von der ersten Meldung bis zum Ergebnis im Mittel 62 Tage (33 Verfahren, 24 Monate).

Sie erhält im Median 2 Angebote je Los (70 Lose mit Angabe).

Wertung laut Bekanntmachung: Preis 50 %, Leistung und Qualität 50 %.

  • Price50 %
  • Design process Detailing of the design concept15 %
  • Production: Description of all production steps ensuring compliance with all technical precision specifications and quality features12,5 %
  • Quality assurance and documentation12,5 %
  • Compliance with the time and delivery schedule10 %

Unterlagen schon heruntergeladen? Vergabeunterlagen prüfen (Team): Fristen, Gewichtung, Mengen, Zertifikate und Fehler im Preisblatt.

Mein Angebot ist% teurer als das günstigste.

Das kostet etwa 8,3 von 100 Punkten der Gesamtwertung.

Punktverlust je Mehrpreis
10 % teurer−4,5 Punkte
25 % teurer−10 Punkte
50 % teurer−16,7 Punkte
100 % teurer−25 Punkte

Annahme: Preispunkte = günstigstes Angebot geteilt durch das eigene. Die verbindliche Formel steht in den Vergabeunterlagen.

Fristen und TermineStand 07.11.2026

  1. Veröffentlichung
    vor 14 Monaten
  2. Heute

Beschreibung

The pumping chambers serve as the interface for the ion getter pumps and vacuum diagnostic components of the Super-FRS beamline. It shall also be equipped with one or two bellows, three pumping ports, and a vacuum diagnostic port. The DN400CF pumping chambers with integrated hydroformed bellows of the Super-FRS beamline are designed to operate at room temperature under an ultimate pressure below 10^7 mbar. The hydroformed bellows function as flexible and adaptable connections between adjacent vacuum components, ensuring vacuum integrity while accommodating mechanical tolerances and thermal expansion. A total of seven DN400CF pumping chambers and their support frames are required as part of this.

Beschreibung des Loses

7 DN400CF Pumping chambers with integrated hydroformed bellows, pumping ports and vacuum diagnostic port as well as 7 support structures for the pumping chambers.

Bedingungen

Zuschlag5 von 5 angegeben

Preis
PriceGewichtung (Punkte, genau) 50Consideration of the price through the valuation method "Preis-Quotient-Methode"
Qualität
Design process Detailing of the design conceptGewichtung (Punkte, genau) 15Logical and comprehensible presentation of the design concept. Detailed description of production and manufacturing processes, including technical equipment. Detailed procedure ensuring compliance with crucial manufacturing tolerances. Clear explanation of how specifications are met, including manufacturing, assembly, and testing procedures. Demonstration of a high-quality, state-of-the-art production chain. Proposals for technical improvements and detailed explanations of changes. Dedicated personnel assigned to the project for seamless execution and timely delivery. The proposal must clearly state the planned materials used for production, ensuring they meet required specifications. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Qualität
Production: Description of all production steps ensuring compliance with all technical precision specifications and quality featuresGewichtung (Punkte, genau) 12,5Detailed description of all necessary production and manufacturing processes, including technical equipment. Clear demonstration of how specifications are met, covering manufacturing, assembly, and testing procedures. Comprehensive planning of resources, coordination efforts, and availability of materials/components. Statements concerning subcontractors and the quality of materials and components used in production. Evaluation of the production chain, focusing on the quality and technological advancement of machines and tools used. Assessment of welding methods for accuracy, safety, and prevention of deformation. Evaluation of surface treatment and cleaning processes, with preference for those ensuring vacuum compatibility. Clear methodology for achieving and guaranteeing specified manufacturing tolerances. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Qualität
Quality assurance and documentationGewichtung (Punkte, genau) 12,5Precise explanation of the QA approach and its involvement in all manufacturing and acceptance tests. Evaluation of how QA is integrated into visual, mechanical, and vacuum and relative magentic permiability tests to ensure design goals. Assessment of how well the described test methods detect errors early, limit, and eliminate them efficiently. Standard-compliant QA documentation, adherence to FAIR standards, and structured reporting on technical characteristics. Relevant certifications for critical production steps (e.g., welding) and compliance with industry standards. Evaluation of professional risk assessment regarding hazards, declaration of incorporation, and mitigation strategies. Logical and transparent offer description; unclear scope is considered a project risk. Assessment of potential project risks that could cause delays or non-fulfillment of goals. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Qualität
Compliance with the time and delivery scheduleGewichtung (Punkte, genau) 10Clear commitment to meeting the agreed delivery schedule with realistic planning. Well-defined project timeline, milestones, and checkpoints to track progress. Assessment of readiness regarding production capacity, material availability, and supply chain stability. Logistical considerations, including shipping, packaging, and handling for safe and timely delivery. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria

Eignung0 von 2 angegeben

Kriterien
keine Angabe
Nachreichen von Unterlagen
keine Angabe

Laufzeit und Umfang2 von 6 angegeben

Vertragsbeginn
keine Angabe
Vertragsende
keine Angabe
Dauer
12 Monate
Verlängerung
keine Angabe
Optionen
keine Angabe
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein

Angebot und Einreichung0 von 8 angegeben

Elektronische Einreichung
keine Angabe
Einreichung über
keine Angabe
Sprache
keine Angabe
Nebenangebote
keine Angabe
Mehrere Hauptangebote
keine Angabe
Bindefrist
keine Angabe
Angebotsöffnung
keine Angabe
Sicherheiten
keine Angabe

Ausführung1 von 4 angegeben

Vertraulichkeit
keine Angabe
E-Rechnung
keine Angabe
Vorbehaltene Ausführung
keine Angabe
EU-Mittel
Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert

Rechtsschutz3 von 3 angegeben

Nachprüfungsstelle
Vergabekammer des Bundes, Villemomblerstr. 76, 53123 Bonn
Fristen für Nachprüfungsanträge
The competent investigating authority is as follows Vergabekammer des Bundes Villemombler Str. 76 D-53123 Bonn, Germany Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Web: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html The applicant is reques … ganz lesenThe competent investigating authority is as follows Vergabekammer des Bundes Villemombler Str. 76 D-53123 Bonn, Germany Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Web: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html The applicant is requested to clearly identify those parts of the request to participate (and any subsequent bid) containing company/business secrets. If this does not happen, the public procurement tribunal will assume consent to inspect the documents as required in the case of carrying out a review procedure (Section 165 (3) Act against Restraints of Competition (Competition Act - GWB)). As the awarding authority, FAIR is required to provide the public procurement tribunal with immediate access to the files when a review procedure is initiated (Section 163 (2) sentence 3 GWB). Applicants/bidders have the right to demand that the Contracting authority comply with the provisions on the award procedure protecting bidders (Section 97 (6) GWB). Applicants/bidders with an interest in the public contract who believe their rights have been violated by non-compliance with the provisions governing the awarding of public contracts, must raise an objection about the violation to FAIR within ten calendar days (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 1 GWB). Violations known from the tender notice or tender documents must be claimed vis-a-vis FAIR before the time limit given for submission of applications (offers) (Section 160 (3) 1 No. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs the applicant/bidder that it is unwilling to redress the objection, an application for review may then be filed with the public procurement tribunal above within 15 days of receipt of the notification (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 4 GWB). Bidders whose bids are not to be considered for the award of the contract will be notified before the awarding of the contract pursuant to Section 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calendar days after FAIR has sent out this information. This period is ten calendar days when transmission is by fax or email. The period commences on the day following the dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this time period has expired, an award is possible even if a time limit pursuant to Section 160 (3) GWB has yet to expire. Therefore, in order to prevent an award, a request for review needs to have been served upon FAIR by the public procurement tribunal before the expiry of the time limit under Section 134 GWB. Pursuant to Section 135 (1) and (2) GWB, the invalidity of an award can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 calendar days from the date on which there was notification on the conclusion of the agreement, though no later than six months after the agreement was concluded. If the Contracting authority published the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, the time limit for claiming ineffectiveness shall expire 30 calendar days after the publication of the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union. Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is available at: www.gsi.de/data-protection
Beschaffungsübereinkommen (GPA)
fällt darunter

Zusätzliche Informationen1 von 1 angegeben

Hinweis
Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXS0YYEYTAZK93E7 The only form of submission of participation applications accepted by Awarding Authority is in writing, electronically Note: In Writing, Electronically Participation applications shall be submitted electronically within the deadline via the German awarding pl … ganz lesenBekanntmachungs-ID: CXS0YYEYTAZK93E7 The only form of submission of participation applications accepted by Awarding Authority is in writing, electronically Note: In Writing, Electronically Participation applications shall be submitted electronically within the deadline via the German awarding platform DTVP. URL: http://www.dtvp.de/Center/ The forms and other documents to be completed, provided by FAIR, may be - either completed on the online tendering tool under the section "Documents to Be Completed" or - created and compiled separately by Candidate together with the other components of the participation application or tender (concepts or explanations etc.), then uploaded under the heading "Own Documents". However, Candidates should not fill in the forms online and upload them again separately, as this can result in transmission errors and increases the workload on both sides. In order to comply with the text form (in writing) according to § 126b BGB [transl.: German Civil Code] when submitting participation applications, Candidates must provide the following information: - In the case of natural persons, the full name (first name and surname) must be given (name of the declaring person in the participation application form). - In the case of legal entities and commercial companies and corporations, the name of the company and its legal form must be stated. In addition, the full name of the employee who is submitting the participation application on behalf of the company (name of the declaring person in the participation application form) must be stated. The insertion of a company logo is not sufficient. - In the case of Bidding Consortia, the declaring person according to § 126b BGB shall be the employee of the leading member who submits the participation application on behalf of the Bidding Consortium; besides, the form "Bidding Consortium Declaration" must be submitted. It should be noted that in the case of electronic submission, the text form according to § 126b BGB is only observed if the participation applications are transmitted in encrypted form via the awarding platform (cf. information on eVergabe). Submitting the participation application via email is not sufficient. In the case of incorrect/ incomplete information that violates the aforementioned formal requirements, participation applications will be excluded unless Candidate cannot be held responsible (§ 57 para. 1 nr. 1, para. 3 VgV). FAIR reserves the right to negotiate only with the three Bidders whose initial tenders have received the highest scores in the preliminary evaluation. Note: Weighting: 50% price, 50% performance criteria (30% design process, 25% production, 25% Quality Assurance and documentation, 20% compliance with the time and delivery schedule); points from 0-10. Note: Communication with Candidates Communication with Candidates takes place via the DTVP's tender platform. Questions must be sent to FAIR via DTVP and will are answered via DTVP. Questions posed orally or by telephone regarding the documents or the contractual object will not be answered; answers given orally or by telephone are not binding. ------------------------ Note: Electronic Invoicing "The XInvoicing format is accepted with additional transmission of the invoice as a -pdf-."

Bezeichnungen aus den amtlichen eForms-Codelisten (EU und eForms-DE). Maßgeblich sind die Vergabeunterlagen.

Zuschläge

Zuschläge je Los
Zuschlag anAngebote
SAES RIAL Vacuum S.r.l., Parma3

AuftraggeberZur Seite der Vergabestelle

Anschrift
Planckstr. 1, 64291 Darmstadt
Kontakt
kein Funktionspostfach angegeben, siehe Originalbekanntmachung

Bei uns erfasst

315Bekanntmachungen
159Zuschlagsmeldungen

Alle Ausschreibungen und Zuschläge dieser Vergabestelle

Wer hat das zuletzt gewonnen?

Letzte vergleichbare Vergabe (2024): Vacuum Chambers for sc Dipoles for SFRS

Gleiche Vergabestelle und sehr ähnlicher Titel, vergeben am 11.09.2024. Ob es wirklich dieselbe Leistung ist, zeigt die Bekanntmachung.

Mehr von FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH

Alle 4 offenen Ausschreibungen von FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH, dazu Zuschläge und Auftragnehmer

Marktumfeldvon uns ausgewertet

Vergabemeldungen der letzten 24 Monate mit Hauptgegenstand CPV 316 (Elektrische Ausrüstung) in Hessen. Abgeleitet aus veröffentlichten Bekanntmachungen, keine amtliche Statistik. Zuschlagswerte unter 1.000 € zählen wir als Platzhalter nicht mit.

63vergebene Aufträge
1Angebote je Los im Median (47 Lose mit Angabe)
280.585 €Zuschlagswert im Median
123.565 € – 406.535 €mittlere Hälfte, 25 Werte

Mehr Marktdaten, Vergabestellen und offene Ausschreibungen: Labor- und Messgeräte in Hessen (9 offen)

Häufige Zuschlagsempfänger

Preise und WettbewerbPremium

Verlauf des Verfahrens3 Meldungen

  1. Vergabebekanntmachung (diese Seite)
  2. BekanntmachungFrist 08.04.2025
  3. 1. Berichtigung · Korrektur – BeschafferFrist von 08.04.2025 auf 28.04.2025 verschoben

Berichtigte Fassungen bleiben aufrufbar. Die Suche zeigt je Verfahren nur die aktuelle.

Ähnliche offene Ausschreibungen

Quelle: Bekanntmachungsservice des Bundes (oeffentlichevergabe.de), Lizenz CC0. Stand der Daten: 03.11.2026. Maßgeblich ist allein die Originalbekanntmachung. Kennung 86e7be4f-4cdd-4e25-ad6f-b7df4bd6ff68.