Zum Inhalt
Menü
Merken
vergebenEU-weitLieferleistungen

Focal Plane Vacuum Chambers for SFRS

FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH · Darmstadt, Hessen

Aktenzeichen 35/2600017626FAIRveröffentlicht 01.11.2024LieferleistungenVerhandlungsverfahren mit Teilnahmewettbewerb

Frist im Verfahrenkeine Angabe

Dieses Verfahren ist abgeschlossen oder älter. Die Seite bleibt zur Information erreichbar.

Diese Frist ist vorbei. Das läuft gerade

Offene Ausschreibungen derselben Leistung im Gebiet Darmstadt.

Alle Ausschreibungen: Lieferleistungen in Hessen (108 offen)

Auf einen Blick

Art des Auftrags
Lieferleistungen
Geschätzter Wert
keine Angabe
Laufzeit
keine Angabe
Lose
1
Verfahren
Verhandlungsverfahren mit TeilnahmewettbewerbVgV, EU-weit
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein
Ort der Leistung
Darmstadt64291, Hessen
Einreichung
keine Angabe

Schnellprüfung für Bieter

  • Unterlagen frei zugänglichkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Einreichung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Nebenangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Mehrere Hauptangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Laut Auftraggeber für KMU geeignetkeine Angabe
  • Sicherheiten verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Teilnahme vorbehalten (z. B. Werkstätten)keine Angabe
  • E-Rechnung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Vertraulichkeitserklärung verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Auktionnein
  • Aus EU-Mitteln finanziertnein
  • Wiederkehrender Auftragkeine Angabe

Einordnungvon uns ausgewertet

Wer darf bieten?

Zuerst bewerben sich Unternehmen mit einem Teilnahmeantrag, danach geben ausgewählte Bewerber Angebote ab.

Wird verhandelt?

Über Inhalt und Preis der Angebote kann verhandelt werden. Oft behält sich die Vergabestelle vor, den Zuschlag ohne Verhandlung zu erteilen: Das erste Angebot sollte dann schon das letzte sein.

Was jetzt zu tun ist

Kein Angebot mehr möglich. Wer gewonnen hat und wie viele Angebote eingingen, steht unter Zuschläge; für Folgeaufträge lohnt der Blick auf Laufzeit und Vergabestelle.

Das Verfahren ist abgeschlossen; diese Meldung nennt das Ergebnis.

Bei dieser Vergabestelle vergehen von der ersten Meldung bis zum Ergebnis im Mittel 62 Tage (33 Verfahren, 24 Monate).

Sie erhält im Median 2 Angebote je Los (70 Lose mit Angabe).

Wertung laut Bekanntmachung: Preis 40 %, Leistung und Qualität 60 %.

  • Price40 %
  • Compliance with the time and delivery schedule9 %
  • Quality assurance and documentation18 %
  • Production: Description of all production steps ensuring compliance with all technical precision specifications and quality features15 %
  • Design process: Detailing of the design concept18 %

Unterlagen schon heruntergeladen? Vergabeunterlagen prüfen (Team): Fristen, Gewichtung, Mengen, Zertifikate und Fehler im Preisblatt.

Mein Angebot ist% teurer als das günstigste.

Das kostet etwa 6,7 von 100 Punkten der Gesamtwertung.

Punktverlust je Mehrpreis
10 % teurer−3,6 Punkte
25 % teurer−8 Punkte
50 % teurer−13,3 Punkte
100 % teurer−20 Punkte

Annahme: Preispunkte = günstigstes Angebot geteilt durch das eigene. Die verbindliche Formel steht in den Vergabeunterlagen.

Fristen und TermineStand 07.11.2026

  1. Veröffentlichung
    vor 24 Monaten
  2. Heute

Beschreibung

The scope of the contract includes the design, construction, and testing of the 11 focal plane vacuum chambers and associated support frames for the Super-FRS at FAIR. The top plate of the focal plane chamber serves as the position reference for the beam diagnostic elements. Focal plane chambers are integral parts of the Super-FRS beam line vacuum infrastructure and act as the vacuum interface for the beam diagnostic elements.

Gegenstand nach CPV

Bedingungen

Zuschlag5 von 5 angegeben

Price40 %
Compliance with the time and delivery schedule9 %
Quality assurance and documentation18 %
Production: Description of all production steps ensuring compliance with all technical precision specifications and quality features15 %
Design process: Detailing of the design concept18 %
Preis
Price
Qualität
Compliance with the time and delivery scheduleThe bidder shall describe in detail how the targeted time and delivery schedule could be met. A binding and comprehensible promise of compliance with the delivery schedule is evaluated positive. The bidder shall also describe the dealing with possible delays in delivery or service caused by subcontractors. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Qualität
Quality assurance and documentationThe bidder shall precisely explain the concrete approach and involvement of quality assurance within all manufacturing processes and acceptance tests (visual, mechanical and vacuum). It should become apparent how the measures contribute to the fulfillment of the specifications and how the technical characteristics are controlled and recorded. It will be evaluated whether the test methods described can detect errors at an early stage, limit them and eliminate them efficiently. The planned documentation of the tests is also included in the evaluation. QA documentation in compliance with specified FAIR standards and professional risk assessment will be evaluated positive. Furthermore it is evaluated, how much the tests will ensure the design goals. - Precise explanation of the concrete approach and integration of quality assurance in all acceptance tests. It is evaluated how the organisation and documentation tests will ensure the design goals. - Relevant certificates for critical production steps, like welding, and the standards these works are to be carried out. Often these standards have different levels. - Standard compliant QA documentation; Risk assessment for hazards, declaration of incorporation. It should be shown that the Contractor can deliver the demanded documentation. - Logical and transparent description of the offer in itself. An unclear scope poses a project risk. - Possibly an investigation of project risks, which may lead to delays or non fulfilment of goals. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Qualität
Production: Description of all production steps ensuring compliance with all technical precision specifications and quality featuresA comprehensive description of all necessary production and manufacturing processes, along with technical equipment details, is required. It should clearly demonstrate how the specifications will be met and how the end product will be manufactured, assembled, and tested in compliance with all conditions, technical precision requirements, and quality features. The proposal should also encompass project planning aspects such as resource allocation, estimated coordination efforts, and the availability of required materials and components. Additionally, it should include statements concerning subcontractors and the quality of materials and components. Evaluation criteria will focus on assessing whether the description indicates a high-quality, state-of-the-art production chain, particularly regarding the machines and tools to be utilized. Welding methods will be evaluated based on their ability to achieve accuracy, ensure safety, and prevent deformation during the welding process. Surface treatment and cleaning procedures will be assessed based on their respective levels, with preference given to methods that ensure the safe attainment of vacuum goals. The procedure for achieving specified manufacturing tolerances should be outlined, and methods for guaranteeing these goals will be viewed positively. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Qualität
Design process: Detailing of the design conceptTechnical Offer shall cover the following - A comprehensible, logical presentation and description of the design concept is requested. - A detailed description of all necessary production and manufacturing processes is expected, including details of the technical equipment. - The mechanical tolerance of the top plate of the focal planer chambers is of crucial importance. The procedure regarding the mechanical feasibility of compliance with the required manufacturing tolerances shall be described in detail. - It should be clear how the fulfillment of the specifications is achieved and how the end product is manufactured, assembled, and tested in compliance with all conditions, technical precision specifications, and quality features. - Evaluation will focus on whether a high-quality, state-of-the-art production chain is evident from the description. - The solution offered may contain proposals for technical improvements to the specification. Such technical changes must be described in detail in the explanations of the offer. - Dedicated personnel to the project is expected to ensure seamless execution and timely delivery. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria

Eignung0 von 2 angegeben

Kriterien
keine Angabe
Nachreichen von Unterlagen
keine Angabe

Laufzeit und Umfang1 von 5 angegeben

Vertragsbeginn
keine Angabe
Vertragsende
keine Angabe
Verlängerung
keine Angabe
Optionen
keine Angabe
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein

Angebot und Einreichung0 von 8 angegeben

Elektronische Einreichung
keine Angabe
Einreichung über
keine Angabe
Sprache
keine Angabe
Nebenangebote
keine Angabe
Mehrere Hauptangebote
keine Angabe
Bindefrist
keine Angabe
Angebotsöffnung
keine Angabe
Sicherheiten
keine Angabe

Ausführung1 von 4 angegeben

Vertraulichkeit
keine Angabe
E-Rechnung
keine Angabe
Vorbehaltene Ausführung
keine Angabe
EU-Mittel
Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert

Rechtsschutz3 von 3 angegeben

Nachprüfungsstelle
Vergabekammer des Bundes, Villemomblerstr. 76, 53123 Bonn
Fristen für Nachprüfungsanträge
The competent reviewing authority is Federal Public Procurement Tribunal Villemombler Straße 76 53123 Bonn Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Website: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html The applicants are made aware of t … ganz lesenThe competent reviewing authority is Federal Public Procurement Tribunal Villemombler Straße 76 53123 Bonn Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Website: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html The applicants are made aware of the legal meaning of § 160, para. 3 of the German Act Against Restraints of Competition, particularly its no. 4. § 160 Introduction, Application (1) The public procurement tribunal shall initiate review procedures only upon application. (2) Every undertaking which has an interest in the contract and claims that its rights under § 97 para. 7 were violated by non-compliance with the provisions governing the awarding of public contracts has the right to file an application. In doing so, it must be shown that the undertaking has suffered a loss, or may be about to suffer a loss, in consequence of the alleged violation of provisions governing the awarding of public contracts. (3) The application is inadmissible, if 1. the applicant became aware of the violation of provisions governing the awarding of public contracts during the award procedure and did not object to the contracting entity without undue delay. 2. violations of provisions governing the awarding of public contracts which become apparent from the tender notice are not notified to the contracting entity by the end of the period specified in the notice for the submission of a tender or application. 3. violations of provisions governing the awarding of public contracts which only become apparent from the award documents are not notified to the contracting entity by the end of the period specified in the notice for the submission of a tender or application. 4. more than 15 calendar days have expired since receipt of notification from the contracting entity that it is unwilling to redress the complaint. Sentence 1 shall not apply to an application under § 101b (1) no. 2 to have the award contract declared ineffective. § 101a para. 1 sentence 2 shall remain unaffected. Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is available at: www.gsi.de/data-protection
Beschaffungsübereinkommen (GPA)
fällt darunter

Zusätzliche Informationen1 von 1 angegeben

Hinweis
Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXS0YYEY115VSWVY The only form of submission of participation applications accepted by Awarding Authority is in writing, electronically Participation applications shall be submitted electronically within the deadline via the German awarding platform DTVP. URL: http://www.dtvp.d … ganz lesenBekanntmachungs-ID: CXS0YYEY115VSWVY The only form of submission of participation applications accepted by Awarding Authority is in writing, electronically Participation applications shall be submitted electronically within the deadline via the German awarding platform DTVP. URL: http://www.dtvp.de/Center/ The forms and other documents to be completed, provided by FAIR, may be - either completed on the online tendering tool under the section "Documents to Be Completed" or - created and compiled separately by Candidate together with the other components of the participation application or tender (concepts or explanations etc.), then uploaded under the heading "Own Documents". However, Candidates should not fill in the forms online and upload them again separately, as this can result in transmission errors and increases the workload on both sides. In order to comply with the text form (in writing) according to § 126b BGB [transl.: German Civil Code] when submitting participation applications, Candidates must provide the following information: - In the case of natural persons, the full name (first name and surname) must be given (name of the declaring person in the participation application form). - In the case of legal entities and commercial companies and corporations, the name of the company and its legal form must be stated. In addition, the full name of the employee who is submitting the participation application on behalf of the company (name of the declaring person in the participation application form) must be stated. The insertion of a company logo is not sufficient. - In the case of Bidding Consortia, the declaring person according to § 126b BGB shall be the employee of the leading member who submits the participation application on behalf of the Bidding Consortium; besides, the form "Bidding Consortium Declaration" must be submitted. It should be noted that in the case of electronic submission, the text form according to § 126b BGB is only observed if the participation applications are transmitted in encrypted form via the awarding platform (cf. information on eVergabe). Submitting the participation application via email is not sufficient. In the case of incorrect/ incomplete information that violates the aforementioned formal requirements, participation applications will be excluded unless Candidate cannot be held responsible (§ 57 para. 1 nr. 1, para. 3 VgV). ------------------------ Note: Weighting 40 % price, 60 % performance criteria The criteria in detail are: Design process, Detailing of the design concept: 30%; Production: Description of all production steps ensuring compliance with all technical precision specifications and quality features: 25% Quality assurance and documentation: 30%; Compliance with the time and delivery schedule: 15% ------------------------ Communication with Candidates takes place via the DTVP's tender platform. Questions must be sent to FAIR via DTVP and will are answered via DTVP. Questions posed orally or by telephone regarding the documents or the contractual object will not be answered; answers given orally or by telephone are not binding.

Bezeichnungen aus den amtlichen eForms-Codelisten (EU und eForms-DE). Maßgeblich sind die Vergabeunterlagen.

Zuschläge

Zuschläge je Los
Zuschlag anAngebote
STREICHER, spol. s r.o. Plzen, Stenovice6

AuftraggeberZur Seite der Vergabestelle

Name
FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH
Art
Von einer Bundesbehörde kontrolliertes oder finanziertes öffentliches Unternehmen, Bildung
Anschrift
Planckstr. 1, 64291 Darmstadt
Kontakt
kein Funktionspostfach angegeben, siehe Originalbekanntmachung
Auskünfte
FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH

Bei uns erfasst

315Bekanntmachungen
159Zuschlagsmeldungen

Alle Ausschreibungen und Zuschläge dieser Vergabestelle

Wer hat das zuletzt gewonnen?

Letzte vergleichbare Vergabe (2024): Vacuum Chambers for sc Dipoles for SFRS

Gleiche Vergabestelle und sehr ähnlicher Titel, vergeben am 11.09.2024. Ob es wirklich dieselbe Leistung ist, zeigt die Bekanntmachung.

Mehr von FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH

Alle 4 offenen Ausschreibungen von FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH, dazu Zuschläge und Auftragnehmer

Marktumfeldvon uns ausgewertet

Vergabemeldungen der letzten 24 Monate mit Hauptgegenstand CPV 316 (Elektrische Ausrüstung) in Hessen. Abgeleitet aus veröffentlichten Bekanntmachungen, keine amtliche Statistik. Zuschlagswerte unter 1.000 € zählen wir als Platzhalter nicht mit.

63vergebene Aufträge
1Angebote je Los im Median (47 Lose mit Angabe)
280.585 €Zuschlagswert im Median
123.565 € – 406.535 €mittlere Hälfte, 25 Werte

Mehr Marktdaten, Vergabestellen und offene Ausschreibungen: Lieferleistungen in Hessen (108 offen)

Häufige Zuschlagsempfänger

Preise und WettbewerbPremium

Ähnliche offene Ausschreibungen

Quelle: Bekanntmachungsservice des Bundes (oeffentlichevergabe.de), Lizenz CC0. Stand der Daten: 04.11.2026. Maßgeblich ist allein die Originalbekanntmachung. Kennung 70744b07-b33a-401a-ac0a-f9a9098cfd76.