Zum Inhalt
Menü
Merken
vergebenEU-weitLieferleistungen

Y-shaped vacuum chamber for the branching dipole of super-FRS

FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH · Darmstadt, Hessen

Aktenzeichen 33F/2600005297FAIRveröffentlicht 30.04.2024LieferleistungenVerhandlungsverfahren mit Teilnahmewettbewerb

Frist im Verfahrenkeine Angabe

Dieses Verfahren ist abgeschlossen oder älter. Die Seite bleibt zur Information erreichbar.

Diese Frist ist vorbei. Das läuft gerade

Offene Ausschreibungen derselben Leistung im Gebiet Darmstadt.

Alle Ausschreibungen: Lieferleistungen in Hessen (109 offen)

Auf einen Blick

Art des Auftrags
Lieferleistungen
Geschätzter Wert
keine Angabe
Laufzeit
keine Angabe
Lose
1
Verfahren
Verhandlungsverfahren mit TeilnahmewettbewerbVgV, EU-weit
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein
Ort der Leistung
Darmstadt64291, Hessen
Einreichung
keine Angabe

Schnellprüfung für Bieter

  • Unterlagen frei zugänglichkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Einreichung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Nebenangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Mehrere Hauptangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Laut Auftraggeber für KMU geeignetkeine Angabe
  • Sicherheiten verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Teilnahme vorbehalten (z. B. Werkstätten)keine Angabe
  • E-Rechnung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Vertraulichkeitserklärung verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Auktionnein
  • Aus EU-Mitteln finanziertnein
  • Wiederkehrender Auftragkeine Angabe

Einordnungvon uns ausgewertet

Wer darf bieten?

Zuerst bewerben sich Unternehmen mit einem Teilnahmeantrag, danach geben ausgewählte Bewerber Angebote ab.

Wird verhandelt?

Über Inhalt und Preis der Angebote kann verhandelt werden. Oft behält sich die Vergabestelle vor, den Zuschlag ohne Verhandlung zu erteilen: Das erste Angebot sollte dann schon das letzte sein.

Was jetzt zu tun ist

Kein Angebot mehr möglich. Wer gewonnen hat und wie viele Angebote eingingen, steht unter Zuschläge; für Folgeaufträge lohnt der Blick auf Laufzeit und Vergabestelle.

Das Verfahren ist abgeschlossen; diese Meldung nennt das Ergebnis.

Bei dieser Vergabestelle vergehen von der ersten Meldung bis zum Ergebnis im Mittel 62 Tage (33 Verfahren, 24 Monate).

Sie erhält im Median 2 Angebote je Los (70 Lose mit Angabe).

Wertung laut Bekanntmachung: Preis 40 %, Leistung und Qualität 60 %.

  • Precio40 %
  • Design process - Detailing of the design concept18 %
  • Compliance with the time and delivery schedule12 %
  • Quality assurance and documentation18 %
  • Production - description of all production steps ensuring compliance with all technical precision specification and quality features12 %

Unterlagen schon heruntergeladen? Vergabeunterlagen prüfen (Team): Fristen, Gewichtung, Mengen, Zertifikate und Fehler im Preisblatt.

Mein Angebot ist% teurer als das günstigste.

Das kostet etwa 6,7 von 100 Punkten der Gesamtwertung.

Punktverlust je Mehrpreis
10 % teurer−3,6 Punkte
25 % teurer−8 Punkte
50 % teurer−13,3 Punkte
100 % teurer−20 Punkte

Annahme: Preispunkte = günstigstes Angebot geteilt durch das eigene. Die verbindliche Formel steht in den Vergabeunterlagen.

Fristen und TermineStand 08.11.2026

  1. Veröffentlichung
    vor 30 Monaten
  2. Heute

Beschreibung

Designing, constructing, and testing two Y-shaped vacuum chambers for the 9.75-degree superconducting dipoles for the branching dipole stages of the Super-FRS. The contractor is required to provide comprehensive information on the design, production, and testing concepts, as well as the procedures for Quality Assurance/Management.

Beschreibung des Loses

Following items and services shall be delivered by the contractor - 2 x Y-shaped dipole vacuum chambers. - 2 x Support structures to integrate the Y-shaped dipole vacuum chambers to the dipoles. - 1 x DN400CF blind flange - 1 x DN400CF-DN250CF adapter flange - 1 x Special rectangular/racetrack blind flange compatible with the chamber flange design (e.g. helicoflex). - Gaskets for the flanges as specified in the detailed specification. - Final welding of the flanges on company site after the integration of the vacuum chambers into the magnet (Integration is the responsibility of the company). The material 1.4429 ESU (2m X 1m plates with thicknesses 10 mm, 8 m and 6 mm) specified by the client is provided for the project. Spare parts: 9 pieces Gaskets for the branching dipole of super-FRS; 18 pieces Copper gasket for DN400CF

Gegenstand nach CPV

Bedingungen

Zuschlag5 von 5 angegeben

Precio40 %
Design process - Detailing of the design concept18 %
Compliance with the time and delivery schedule12 %
Quality assurance and documentation18 %
Production - description of all production steps ensuring compliance with all technical precision specification and quality features12 %
Preis
Precio
Qualität
Design process - Detailing of the design conceptA comprehensible, logical presentation and description of the design concept is asked for. People should be dedicated to the project. - The quality of the planned simulations and simulation methodology is rated. The possibility to include alternatives to the given preliminary design in case of technical problems is rated positive. Furthermore simple and flexible solutions to to achieve the specifications are evaluated positively.
Qualität
Compliance with the time and delivery scheduleThe bidder shall describe in detail how the targeted time and delivery schedule could be met. A binding and comprehensible promise of compliance with the delivery schedule is evaluated positive. The bidder shall also describe the dealing with possible delays in delivery or service caused by subcontractors.
Qualität
Quality assurance and documentationThe bidder shall precisely explain the concrete approach and involvement of quality assurance within all manufacturing processes and acceptance tests (visual, mechanical, vacuum, water-cooling). It should become apparent how the measures contribute to the fulfillment of the specifications and how the technical characteristics are controlled and recorded. It will be evaluated whether the test methods described can detect errors at an early stage, limit them and eliminate them efficiently. The planned documentation of the tests is also included in the evaluation. QA documentation in compliance with specified FAIR standards and professional risk assessment will be evaluated positive. Furthermore it is evaluated, how much the tests will ensure the design goals. - Precise explanation of the concrete approach and integration of quality assurance in all acceptance tests. It is evaluated how the organisation and documentation tests will ensure the design goals. - Relevant certificates for critical production steps, like welding, and the standards these works are to be carried out. Often these standards have different levels. - Standard compliant QA documentation; Risk assessment for hazards, declaration of incorporation. It should be shown that the Contractor can deliver the demanded documentation. - Logical and transparent description of the offer in itself. An unclear scope poses a project risk. - Possibly an investigation of project risks, which may lead to delays or non fulfilment of goals.
Qualität
Production - description of all production steps ensuring compliance with all technical precision specification and quality featuresExpected from the bidder is a comprehensible, logical presentation and description of the production concept, including the involvement of subcontractors. - Furthermore a detailed description of all necessary production and manufacturing processes is expected, including details of the technical equipment. It should be comprehensible how the fulfillment of the specifications is achieved and how the end product is manufactured, assembled and tested in compliance with all conditions, technical precision requirements and quality features. - Include a description of the project planning with resource planning and estimated coordination efforts, as well as a statement on the availability of the required material and components, statements on subcontractors, statements on the quality of the material and components. - It is evaluated whether the description shows a high-quality, state-of-the-art production chain, in particular which machines/tools are to be used. - Welding methods for better accuracy, safety, or avoiding deformation during welding are rated. - Surface treatment and cleaning can have different levels. A safe achievement of the vacuum goals is rated as positive. - The procedure for achieving the specified manufacturing tolerances should be described and a safe method for guaranteeing the goals is evaluated positive.

Eignung0 von 2 angegeben

Kriterien
keine Angabe
Nachreichen von Unterlagen
keine Angabe

Laufzeit und Umfang1 von 5 angegeben

Vertragsbeginn
keine Angabe
Vertragsende
keine Angabe
Verlängerung
keine Angabe
Optionen
keine Angabe
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein

Angebot und Einreichung0 von 8 angegeben

Elektronische Einreichung
keine Angabe
Einreichung über
keine Angabe
Sprache
keine Angabe
Nebenangebote
keine Angabe
Mehrere Hauptangebote
keine Angabe
Bindefrist
keine Angabe
Angebotsöffnung
keine Angabe
Sicherheiten
keine Angabe

Ausführung1 von 4 angegeben

Vertraulichkeit
keine Angabe
E-Rechnung
keine Angabe
Vorbehaltene Ausführung
keine Angabe
EU-Mittel
Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert

Rechtsschutz3 von 3 angegeben

Nachprüfungsstelle
Vergabekammer des Bundes, Villemomblerstr. 76, 53123 Bonn
Fristen für Nachprüfungsanträge
The competent investigating authority is as follows Vergabekammer des Bundes Villemombler Str. 76 D-53123 Bonn, Germany Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Web: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html The applicant is reques … ganz lesenThe competent investigating authority is as follows Vergabekammer des Bundes Villemombler Str. 76 D-53123 Bonn, Germany Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Web: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html The applicant is requested to clearly identify those parts of the request to participate (and any subsequent bid) containing company/business secrets. If this does not happen, the public procurement tribunal will assume consent to inspect the documents as required in the case of carrying out a review procedure (Section 165 (3) Act against Restraints of Competition (Competition Act - GWB)). As the awarding authority, FAIR is required to provide the public procurement tribunal with immediate access to the files when a review procedure is initiated (Section 163 (2) sentence 3 GWB). Applicants/bidders have the right to demand that the Contracting authority comply with the provisions on the award procedure protecting bidders (Section 97 (6) GWB). Applicants/bidders with an interest in the public contract who believe their rights have been violated by non-compliance with the provisions governing the awarding of public contracts, must raise an objection about the violation to FAIR within ten calendar days (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 1 GWB). Violations known from the tender notice or tender documents must be claimed vis-a-vis FAIR before the time limit given for submission of applications (offers) (Section 160 (3) 1 No. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs the applicant/bidder that it is unwilling to redress the objection, an application for review may then be filed with the public procurement tribunal above within 15 days of receipt of the notification (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 4 GWB). Bidders whose bids are not to be considered for the award of the contract will be notified before the awarding of the contract pursuant to Section 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calendar days after FAIR has sent out this information. This period is ten calendar days when transmission is by fax or email. The period commences on the day following the dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this time period has expired, an award is possible even if a time limit pursuant to Section 160 (3) GWB has yet to expire. Therefore, in order to prevent an award, a request for review needs to have been served upon FAIR by the public procurement tribunal before the expiry of the time limit under Section 134 GWB. Pursuant to Section 135 (1) and (2) GWB, the invalidity of an award can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 calendar days from the date on which there was notification on the conclusion of the agreement, though no later than six months after the agreement was concluded. If the Contracting authority published the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, the time limit for claiming ineffectiveness shall expire 30 calendar days after the publication of the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Beschaffungsübereinkommen (GPA)
fällt darunter

Zusätzliche Informationen1 von 1 angegeben

Hinweis
Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXS0YYEY1XP94R07 The only form of submission of participation applications accepted by Awarding Authority is in writing, electronically Note: In Writing, Electronically Participation applications shall be submitted electronically within the deadline via the German awarding pl … ganz lesenBekanntmachungs-ID: CXS0YYEY1XP94R07 The only form of submission of participation applications accepted by Awarding Authority is in writing, electronically Note: In Writing, Electronically Participation applications shall be submitted electronically within the deadline via the German awarding platform DTVP. URL: http://www.dtvp.de/Center/ The forms and other documents to be completed, provided by FAIR, may be - either completed on the online tendering tool under the section "Documents to Be Completed" or - created and compiled separately by Candidate together with the other components of the participation application or tender (concepts or explanations etc.), then uploaded under the heading "Own Documents". However, Candidates should not fill in the forms online and upload them again separately, as this can result in transmission errors and increases the workload on both sides. In order to comply with the text form (in writing) according to § 126b BGB [transl.: German Civil Code] when submitting participation applications, Candidates must provide the following information: - In the case of natural persons, the full name (first name and surname) must be given (name of the declaring person in the participation application form). - In the case of legal entities and commercial companies and corporations, the name of the company and its legal form must be stated. In addition, the full name of the employee who is submitting the participation application on behalf of the company (name of the declaring person in the participation application form) must be stated. The insertion of a company logo is not sufficient. - In the case of Bidding Consortia, the declaring person according to § 126b BGB shall be the employee of the leading member who submits the participation application on behalf of the Bidding Consortium; besides, the form "Bidding Consortium Declaration" must be submitted. It should be noted that in the case of electronic submission, the text form according to § 126b BGB is only observed if the participation applications are transmitted in encrypted form via the awarding platform (cf. information on eVergabe). Submitting the participation application via email is not sufficient. In the case of incorrect/ incomplete information that violates the aforementioned formal requirements, participation applications will be excluded unless Candidate cannot be held responsible (§ 57 para. 1 nr. 1, para. 3 VgV). ----------------------- Note: Weighting (Best possible rating is 10 and worst possible rating is 0) 40 % price 60 % performance criteria - Performance criteria: 60% are scaled to 100% 1. Design process - Detailing of the design concept = 30 % 2. Production - description of all production steps ensuring compliance with all technical precision specification and quality features = 20 % 3. Quality assurance and documentation = 30 % 3. Compliance with the time and delivery schedule = 20 % ----------------------- Note: Communication with Candidates Communication with Candidates takes place via the DTVP's tender platform. Questions must be sent to FAIR via DTVP and will are answered via DTVP. Questions posed orally or by telephone regarding the documents or the contractual object will not be answered; answers given orally or by telephone are not binding. ------------------------ Note: Electronic Invoicing "The XInvoicing format is accepted with additional transmission of the invoice as a -pdf-."

Bezeichnungen aus den amtlichen eForms-Codelisten (EU und eForms-DE). Maßgeblich sind die Vergabeunterlagen.

Zuschläge

Zuschläge je Los
Zuschlag anAngebote
CNIM Systemes Industriels, La Seyne-sur-Mer1

AuftraggeberZur Seite der Vergabestelle

Name
FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH
Art
Bundeskanzleramt und Bundesministerien, die den niedrigen Schwellenwert anwenden gem. § 106 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 GWB, Bildung
Anschrift
Planckstr. 1, 64291 Darmstadt
Kontakt
kein Funktionspostfach angegeben, siehe Originalbekanntmachung
Auskünfte
FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH

Bei uns erfasst

315Bekanntmachungen
159Zuschlagsmeldungen

Alle Ausschreibungen und Zuschläge dieser Vergabestelle

Mehr von FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH

Alle 4 offenen Ausschreibungen von FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH, dazu Zuschläge und Auftragnehmer

Marktumfeldvon uns ausgewertet

Vergabemeldungen der letzten 24 Monate mit Hauptgegenstand CPV 316 (Elektrische Ausrüstung) in Hessen. Abgeleitet aus veröffentlichten Bekanntmachungen, keine amtliche Statistik. Zuschlagswerte unter 1.000 € zählen wir als Platzhalter nicht mit.

63vergebene Aufträge
1Angebote je Los im Median (47 Lose mit Angabe)
280.585 €Zuschlagswert im Median
123.565 € – 406.535 €mittlere Hälfte, 25 Werte

Mehr Marktdaten, Vergabestellen und offene Ausschreibungen: Lieferleistungen in Hessen (109 offen)

Häufige Zuschlagsempfänger

Preise und WettbewerbPremium

Ähnliche offene Ausschreibungen

Quelle: Bekanntmachungsservice des Bundes (oeffentlichevergabe.de), Lizenz CC0. Stand der Daten: 04.11.2026. Maßgeblich ist allein die Originalbekanntmachung. Kennung 53b2277e-9129-450c-b685-e4f622c6f192.