Zum Inhalt
Menü
Merken
vergebenEU-weitLabor- und MessgeräteLieferleistungen

Slow Halo Collimator Drives for SIS100

FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH · Darmstadt, Hessen

Aktenzeichen 32/2600026068FAIRveröffentlicht 06.10.2025LieferleistungenVerhandlungsverfahren mit Teilnahmewettbewerb

Frist im Verfahrenkeine Angabe

Dieses Verfahren ist abgeschlossen oder älter. Die Seite bleibt zur Information erreichbar.

Geplant · Neuausschreibung möglich

Vertrag endete voraussichtlich am

bereits erreicht · aus Vertragsdatum und Laufzeit errechnet

Endet ein Vertrag, schreibt die Vergabestelle die Leistung oft neu aus. Merken Sie den Vertrag vor: Wir erinnern Sie per E-Mail vor dem Vertragsende und melden, wenn dieselbe Vergabestelle eine ähnliche Leistung ausschreibt.

Vormerkenmit kostenlosem Konto

Verlängerungen sind nicht eingerechnet. Ob und wann neu ausgeschrieben wird, entscheidet die Vergabestelle. Die Erkennung einer Neuausschreibung ist eine Schätzung. Weitere auslaufende Verträge

Auf einen Blick

Art des Auftrags
Lieferleistungen
Geschätzter Wert
keine Angabe
Laufzeit
13 Monate
Lose
1
Verfahren
Verhandlungsverfahren mit TeilnahmewettbewerbVgV, EU-weit
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein
Ort der Leistung
Darmstadt64291, Hessen
Einreichung
keine Angabe

Schnellprüfung für Bieter

  • Unterlagen frei zugänglichkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Einreichung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Nebenangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Mehrere Hauptangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Laut Auftraggeber für KMU geeignetkeine Angabe
  • Sicherheiten verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Teilnahme vorbehalten (z. B. Werkstätten)keine Angabe
  • E-Rechnung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Vertraulichkeitserklärung verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Auktionnein
  • Aus EU-Mitteln finanziertnein
  • Wiederkehrender Auftragkeine Angabe

Einordnungvon uns ausgewertet

Wer darf bieten?

Zuerst bewerben sich Unternehmen mit einem Teilnahmeantrag, danach geben ausgewählte Bewerber Angebote ab.

Wird verhandelt?

Über Inhalt und Preis der Angebote kann verhandelt werden. Oft behält sich die Vergabestelle vor, den Zuschlag ohne Verhandlung zu erteilen: Das erste Angebot sollte dann schon das letzte sein.

Was jetzt zu tun ist

Kein Angebot mehr möglich. Wer gewonnen hat und wie viele Angebote eingingen, steht unter Zuschläge; für Folgeaufträge lohnt der Blick auf Laufzeit und Vergabestelle.

Das Verfahren ist abgeschlossen; diese Meldung nennt das Ergebnis.

Bei dieser Vergabestelle vergehen von der ersten Meldung bis zum Ergebnis im Mittel 62 Tage (33 Verfahren, 24 Monate).

Sie erhält im Median 2 Angebote je Los (70 Lose mit Angabe).

Wertung laut Bekanntmachung: Preis 30 %, Leistung und Qualität 70 %.

  • Price30 %
  • Transparency, quality, and comprehensiveness of the offer21 %
  • Quality assurance concept and concept of acceptance tests17,5 %
  • Detailed schedule and delivery plan7 %
  • Technical concept and production concept24,5 %

Unterlagen schon heruntergeladen? Vergabeunterlagen prüfen (Team): Fristen, Gewichtung, Mengen, Zertifikate und Fehler im Preisblatt.

Mein Angebot ist% teurer als das günstigste.

Das kostet etwa 5 von 100 Punkten der Gesamtwertung.

Punktverlust je Mehrpreis
10 % teurer−2,7 Punkte
25 % teurer−6 Punkte
50 % teurer−10 Punkte
100 % teurer−15 Punkte

Annahme: Preispunkte = günstigstes Angebot geteilt durch das eigene. Die verbindliche Formel steht in den Vergabeunterlagen.

Fristen und TermineStand 07.11.2026

  1. Veröffentlichung
    vor 13 Monaten
  2. Heute

Beschreibung

SIS100 will be equipped with a halo collimation system to remove unwanted halo particles and catch systematic losses caused by the extraction process. It is required to protect sensitive accelerator components from unavoidable beam loss. Among other components, the halo collimation system consists of moveable collimator blocks. The movability is realized by stepper motor drives with linear guiding systems. This tender includes seven drive systems with collimator blocks and mounting system. The mounting system allows an active cooling of the collimator blocks.

Beschreibung des Loses

These collimators are part of the Ion-halocollimation system in Section 5. In total seven equal stepper motor drives with collimator blocks are required. The collimator blocks are not equal. Their design, especially their length, depends on the installation location.

As Option, additionally, the tender include eight further drive systems for Proton-halocollimaton system in Section 1. Here, the same drive system shall be used in order to save effort for procurement and consts for design.

Gegenstand nach CPV

Bedingungen

Zuschlag5 von 5 angegeben

Preis
PriceGewichtung (Punkte, genau) 30Consideration of the price through the valuation method "Preis-Quotient-Methode"
Qualität
Transparency, quality, and comprehensiveness of the offerGewichtung (Punkte, genau) 21The documents submitted as part of the offer should show that the scope of the order has been understood. It is evaluated positively if the offer is presented clearly and comprehensively and if target-oriented implementations are presented. A high level of transparency in the cost breakdown submitted and expert answers to queries are also rated positively. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Qualität
Quality assurance concept and concept of acceptance testsGewichtung (Punkte, genau) 17,5The bidder shall provide a project-specific QA/QC-planning, including the design phase, production and procurement of tools, used materials, production (work-instructions), assembly, installation, commissioning, documentation (non-conformity reporting), and task management. This also includes all planned measurement equipment and measurement procedures. Faults should be detected, limited and efficiently eliminated at an early stage by means of the described methods. This includes also the description of the complete acceptance test plan (visual, mechanic and vacuum-technical) and the description of the transport plan to FAIR (tools, packaging, transportation safety devices etc.) The completeness, level of detail and the plausibility of the provided information will be evaluated. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Qualität
Detailed schedule and delivery planGewichtung (Punkte, genau) 7It is particularly important to the client that the bidder provides a reliable and detailed production and delivery plan of its own in relation to the schedule proposed by the client (taking into account the procurement processes). The individual process steps should be evident in the plan. The schedule provided with the tender should be critically evaluated and plausibly supplemented with an explanation, in all phases of the project: design, production of the components, assembly of the components, factory acceptance tests and transportation. The completeness, level of detail and the plausibility (realistic time durations) of the provided information will be evaluated. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria
Qualität
Technical concept and production conceptGewichtung (Punkte, genau) 24,5The description of the conceptual implementation should comprehensibly show how the bidder will achieve compliance with all the technical specifications. This includes a description of the project planning with resource planning and estimated coordination effort. The bidder shall also describe possible challenges and risks for the accomplishment of the specifications, and identify and present appropriate approaches. It is expected to describe the following aspects particularly detailed: a) Technical concept for the cooling system integrated into the support structure b) Design and construction approach with specials views onto the edge welded bellows, integrated bakeout system, and support structure c) Manufacturing approach incl. considerations for prototype or First of Series drive d) UHV Cleanliness Handling e) Testing procedure The completeness, level of detail and the plausibility of the provided information will be evaluated. 9-10 points: Very good: particularly outstanding fulfillment of the performance criteria 7-8 points: Good: performance criteria fulfillment significantly above average requirements despite minor deficiencies 5-6 points: Satisfactory: performance criteria fulfillment that still meets average requirements despite minor to moderate deficiencies 3-4 points: Sufficient: fulfillment of the criteria suffering from significant deficiencies, which on the whole is only just usable 0-2 points: Poor to unsatisfactory: completely unusable fulfillment of the required criteria

Eignung0 von 2 angegeben

Kriterien
keine Angabe
Nachreichen von Unterlagen
keine Angabe

Laufzeit und Umfang2 von 6 angegeben

Vertragsbeginn
keine Angabe
Vertragsende
keine Angabe
Dauer
13 Monate
Verlängerung
keine Angabe
Optionen
keine Angabe
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein

Angebot und Einreichung0 von 8 angegeben

Elektronische Einreichung
keine Angabe
Einreichung über
keine Angabe
Sprache
keine Angabe
Nebenangebote
keine Angabe
Mehrere Hauptangebote
keine Angabe
Bindefrist
keine Angabe
Angebotsöffnung
keine Angabe
Sicherheiten
keine Angabe

Ausführung1 von 4 angegeben

Vertraulichkeit
keine Angabe
E-Rechnung
keine Angabe
Vorbehaltene Ausführung
keine Angabe
EU-Mittel
Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert

Rechtsschutz3 von 3 angegeben

Nachprüfungsstelle
Vergabekammer des Bundes, Villemomblerstr. 76, 53123 Bonn
Fristen für Nachprüfungsanträge
The competent investigating authority is as follows Vergabekammer des Bundes Villemombler Str. 76 D-53123 Bonn, Germany Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Web: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html The applicant is requeste … ganz lesenThe competent investigating authority is as follows Vergabekammer des Bundes Villemombler Str. 76 D-53123 Bonn, Germany Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Web: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html The applicant is requested to clearly identify those parts of the request to participate (and any subsequent bid) containing company/business secrets. If this does not happen, the public procurement tribunal will assume consent to inspect the documents as required in the case of carrying out a review procedure (Section 165 (3) Act against Restraints of Competition (Competition Act - GWB)). As the awarding authority, FAIR is required to provide the public procurement tribunal with immediate access to the files when a review procedure is initiated (Section 163 (2) sentence 3 GWB). Applicants/bidders have the right to demand that the Contracting authority comply with the provisions on the award procedure protecting bidders (Section 97 (6) GWB). Applicants/bidders with an interest in the public contract who believe their rights have been violated by non-compliance with the provisions governing the awarding of public contracts, must raise an objection about the violation to FAIR within ten calendar days (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 1 GWB). Violations known from the tender notice or tender documents must be claimed vis-a-vis FAIR before the time limit given for submission of applications (offers) (Section 160 (3) 1 No. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs the applicant/bidder that it is unwilling to redress the objection, an application for review may then be filed with the public procurement tribunal above within 15 days of receipt of the notification (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 4 GWB). Bidders whose bids are not to be considered for the award of the contract will be notified before the awarding of the contract pursuant to Section 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calendar days after FAIR has sent out this information. This period is ten calendar days when transmission is by fax or email. The period commences on the day following the dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this time period has expired, an award is possible even if a time limit pursuant to Section 160 (3) GWB has yet to expire. Therefore, in order to prevent an award, a request for review needs to have been served upon FAIR by the public procurement tribunal before the expiry of the time limit under Section 134 GWB. Pursuant to Section 135 (1) and (2) GWB, the invalidity of an award can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 calendar days from the date on which there was notification on the conclusion of the agreement, though no later than six months after the agreement was concluded. If the Contracting authority published the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, the time limit for claiming ineffectiveness shall expire 30 calendar days after the publication of the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union. Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is available at: www.gsi.de/data-protection
Beschaffungsübereinkommen (GPA)
fällt darunter

Zusätzliche Informationen1 von 1 angegeben

Hinweis
#Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXS0YYEYTKHLE9Y4# Evaluation Criteria: 30% Price 70% (30%Transparency, quality, and comprehensiveness of the offer, 35%Technical concept and production concept, 25% Quality assurance concept and concept of acceptance tests, 10% Detailed schedule and delivery plan) ********** … ganz lesen#Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXS0YYEYTKHLE9Y4# Evaluation Criteria: 30% Price 70% (30%Transparency, quality, and comprehensiveness of the offer, 35%Technical concept and production concept, 25% Quality assurance concept and concept of acceptance tests, 10% Detailed schedule and delivery plan) ******************************************************* Communication with Candidates Communication with Candidates takes place via the DTVP's tender platform. Questions must be sent to FAIR via DTVP and will are answered via DTVP. Questions posed orally or by telephone regarding the documents or the contractual object will not be answered; answers given orally or by telephone are not binding. ------------------------ Note: Electronic Invoicing "The XInvoicing format is accepted with additional transmission of the invoice as a -pdf-." ***************************************************** The only form of submission of participation applications accepted by Awarding Authority is in writing, electronically Note: In Writing, Electronically Participation applications shall be submitted electronically within the deadline via the German awarding platform DTVP. URL: http://www.dtvp.de/Center/ The forms and other documents to be completed, provided by FAIR, may be - either completed on the online tendering tool under the section "Documents to Be Completed" or - created and compiled separately by Candidate together with the other components of the participation application or tender (concepts or explanations etc.), then uploaded under the heading "Own Documents". However, Candidates should not fill in the forms online and upload them again separately, as this can result in transmission errors and increases the workload on both sides. In order to comply with the text form (in writing) according to § 126b BGB [transl.: German Civil Code] when submitting participation applications, Candidates must provide the following information: - In the case of natural persons, the full name (first name and surname) must be given (name of the declaring person in the participation application form). - In the case of legal entities and commercial companies and corporations, the name of the company and its legal form must be stated. In addition, the full name of the employee who is submitting the participation application on behalf of the company (name of the declaring person in the participation application form) must be stated. The insertion of a company logo is not sufficient. - In the case of Bidding Consortia, the declaring person according to § 126b BGB shall be the employee of the leading member who submits the participation application on behalf of the Bidding Consortium; besides, the form "Bidding Consortium Declaration" must be submitted. It should be noted that in the case of electronic submission, the text form according to § 126b BGB is only observed if the participation applications are transmitted in encrypted form via the awarding platform (cf. information on eVergabe). Submitting the participation application via email is not sufficient. In the case of incorrect/ incomplete information that violates the aforementioned formal requirements, participation applications will be excluded unless Candidate cannot be held responsible (§ 57 para. 1 nr. 1, para. 3 VgV). FAIR reserves the right to negotiate only with the three Bidders whose initial tenders have received the highest scores in the preliminary evaluation.

Bezeichnungen aus den amtlichen eForms-Codelisten (EU und eForms-DE). Maßgeblich sind die Vergabeunterlagen.

Zuschläge

Zuschläge je Los
Zuschlag anAngebote
OMEGA PHYSICS, ST GILDAS DE RHUYS3

AuftraggeberZur Seite der Vergabestelle

Name
FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH
Art
Von einer Bundesbehörde kontrolliertes oder finanziertes öffentliches Unternehmen, Bildung
Anschrift
Planckstr. 1, 64291 Darmstadt
Website
fair-center.de
Kontakt
kein Funktionspostfach angegeben, siehe Originalbekanntmachung

Bei uns erfasst

315Bekanntmachungen
159Zuschlagsmeldungen

Alle Ausschreibungen und Zuschläge dieser Vergabestelle

Mehr von FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH

Alle 4 offenen Ausschreibungen von FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH, dazu Zuschläge und Auftragnehmer

Marktumfeldvon uns ausgewertet

Vergabemeldungen der letzten 24 Monate mit Hauptgegenstand CPV 316 (Elektrische Ausrüstung) in Hessen. Abgeleitet aus veröffentlichten Bekanntmachungen, keine amtliche Statistik. Zuschlagswerte unter 1.000 € zählen wir als Platzhalter nicht mit.

63vergebene Aufträge
1Angebote je Los im Median (47 Lose mit Angabe)
280.585 €Zuschlagswert im Median
123.565 € – 406.535 €mittlere Hälfte, 25 Werte

Mehr Marktdaten, Vergabestellen und offene Ausschreibungen: Labor- und Messgeräte in Hessen (9 offen)

Häufige Zuschlagsempfänger

Preise und WettbewerbPremium

Ähnliche offene Ausschreibungen

Quelle: Bekanntmachungsservice des Bundes (oeffentlichevergabe.de), Lizenz CC0. Stand der Daten: 03.11.2026. Maßgeblich ist allein die Originalbekanntmachung. Kennung a5598687-4154-4c30-a59a-4ba406e9d726.