Zum Inhalt
Menü

Qualification support for job creation

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH · Eschborn, Hessen

Aktenzeichen #1veröffentlicht 12.01.2024DienstleistungenOffenes Verfahren

Frist im Verfahrenkeine Angabe

Dieses Verfahren ist abgeschlossen oder älter. Die Seite bleibt zur Information erreichbar.

Bereits vergeben. Das läuft gerade

Offene Ausschreibungen derselben Leistung in Hessen.

Alle Ausschreibungen: Architekturleistungen in Hessen (36 offen)

Auf einen Blick

Art des Auftrags
Dienstleistungen
Geschätzter Wert
keine Angabe
Laufzeit
keine Angabe
Lose
1
Verfahren
Offenes VerfahrenVgV, EU-weit
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein
Ort der Leistung
Eschborn65760, Main-Taunus-Kreis, Hessen
Einreichung
keine Angabe

Schnellprüfung für Bieter

  • Unterlagen frei zugänglichkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Einreichung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Nebenangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Mehrere Hauptangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Laut Auftraggeber für KMU geeignetkeine Angabe
  • Sicherheiten verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Teilnahme vorbehalten (z. B. Werkstätten)keine Angabe
  • E-Rechnung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Vertraulichkeitserklärung verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Auktionnein
  • Aus EU-Mitteln finanziertnein
  • Wiederkehrender Auftragkeine Angabe

Einordnungvon uns ausgewertet

Wer darf bieten?

Alle interessierten Unternehmen dürfen ein Angebot abgeben.

Wird verhandelt?

Es wird nicht verhandelt. Gewertet wird das Angebot so, wie es eingereicht wurde.

Was jetzt zu tun ist

Kein Angebot mehr möglich. Wer gewonnen hat und wie viele Angebote eingingen, steht unter Zuschläge; für Folgeaufträge lohnt der Blick auf Laufzeit und Vergabestelle.

Das Verfahren ist abgeschlossen; diese Meldung nennt das Ergebnis.

Bei dieser Vergabestelle vergehen von der ersten Meldung bis zum Ergebnis im Mittel 122 Tage (270 Verfahren, 24 Monate).

Sie erhält im Median 3 Angebote je Los (1.003 Lose mit Angabe).

Wertung laut Bekanntmachung: Preis 30 %, Leistung und Qualität 70 %.

  • Price30 %
  • Technical assessment70 %

Unterlagen schon heruntergeladen? Vergabeunterlagen prüfen (Team): Fristen, Gewichtung, Mengen, Zertifikate und Fehler im Preisblatt.

Mein Angebot ist% teurer als das günstigste.

Das kostet etwa 5 von 100 Punkten der Gesamtwertung.

Punktverlust je Mehrpreis
10 % teurer−2,7 Punkte
25 % teurer−6 Punkte
50 % teurer−10 Punkte
100 % teurer−15 Punkte

Annahme: Preispunkte = günstigstes Angebot geteilt durch das eigene. Die verbindliche Formel steht in den Vergabeunterlagen.

Fristen und TermineStand 10.11.2026

  1. Veröffentlichung
    vor 34 Monaten
  2. Heute

Beschreibung

The project is being implemented by the German Development corporation, the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). This is done in cooperation with the Political Partner of the project, which is the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MIC). The project aims to promote the creation of decent jobs through corporation with the private sector. It is sector open and corporations may include companies ranging from services, agriculture to industrial sectors. The goals are mainly achieved through implementing - Output 1) qualification measures thus creating opportunities for employment. - Output 2) Technical and partially financial support to companies for employment. - Output 3) A small portion of the funds will be used to apply these 2 approaches also in a supraregional context cooperating with other GIZ country programmes of the same initiative and beyond aiming for synergies, economies of scale and innovation. In terms of qualification measures (Output 1), the key focus is on short-term qualifications that allow for more immediate employment - preferably filling a concrete skills gap by companies" preventing them from hiring. Consequently, longer term education at the university or professional level are not within the core scope of this project. When it comes to technical support to companies (Output 2), the goal is again to deliver support that unlocks more immediate growth and employment potential. Consequently the primary objective of the project is not creating longer-term support structures on the meso level but delivering direct support to companies on a demand-oriented basis. If common needs for growth can be identified among a group of companies, the technical support measures can be bundled and delivered more efficiently. Otherwise support packages need to be customized for each company. All measures must contribute substantially to achieving the articulated results. The Special initiative is implemented in various countries on the African continent. Standard KPIs for all countries articulate concrete targets to be achieved out of which most are represented in the results framework of PPE II in Morocco. Results are collected regularly and aggregated for the entire initiative. The core goal of the project is the creation of good jobs, which fulfill at least the following criteria: 1) > 20 hour work week with a minimum duration of 26 weeks; 2) in compliance with national minimum wage standard, if available; 3) in compliance with ILO norms. Companies of all sizes are targeted. Larger employment effects are however, less likely in the case of micro-enterprises, as these can only absorb limited growth. Therefore, the project will focus on companies with a turnover of EUR 1 million and 15 employees or more (minimum size of a medium-sized company according to the Moroccan definition). Around 2% of all companies fall into this category. The companies should be registered in Morocco, but may also have a foreign ownership structure. Foreign investors based in Morocco in particular make a significant contribution to growth, employment and economic transformation.

Beschreibung des Loses

Overall, the main task of the contractor includes developing training measures to foster qualification resources, with the ultimate goal of job creation. All Training measures delivered through this Service Provider and subcontractors had been identified by an extended analysis of companies' needs in terms of qualified resources. The support for companies through resources qualification should aim to enhance a company"s competitiveness, foster growth, and achieve the ultimate objective, job creation during the project term. To achieve this the developed training measures target companies that have concrete growth projects but need support for resources qualification to realize them successfully or bring them to a broader scale. Among other indicators, the bidder is responsible for supporting companies with the creation of 600 jobs. The results need to be tracked according to GIZ standards. To achieve this, the contractor needs to gather a small team of experts and trainers to design, produce, deliver, and monitor training measures identified as necessary to support companies" growth. The training is precisely identified by companies as required to achieve their recruitment plans. The training should cover all needs in the fields of: Technical skills: Could be performed by the contractor or potential subcontractor if equipment or laboratories are needed. Soft skills Management skills. The provider is therefore responsible of all aspects for training delivery, and placement of candidates including assess of requirements, design, delivery, placement, reporting. While the stated categories are fairly broad. It is obvious that the actual needs of the companies may include very specific support requirements from within these categories to realize their growth plans. Work Packages and Milestones: The contractor is responsible for 6 work packages, each with specific tasks and milestones. These work packages include reviewing sector and region mapping, signing Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) with companies, developing comprehensive training concepts, executing training programs, providing placement support, and reporting on monitoring and evaluation. Milestones for each work package should be identified and achieved within specific delivery dates/periods.

Bedingungen

Zuschlag2 von 2 angegeben

Price30 %
Technical assessment70 %
Preis
PriceThe financial bid is weighted at F: 30%. Set budgets items stated in the tender documents for the financial bid are not part of the evaluation and weighting of the financial bids.
Qualität
Technical assessmentTenders are first rated on their technical merits in accordance with the technical assessment grid for offers specified in the tender documentation. Once the tenders have been evaluated in this way, only technical bids awarded more than 500 points will be included in the evaluation of financial bids. Technical bids that fail to reach this cut-off point will be regarded as unsuitable. The technical bid is weighted at T: 70%.

Eignung0 von 2 angegeben

Kriterien
keine Angabe
Nachreichen von Unterlagen
keine Angabe

Laufzeit und Umfang2 von 5 angegeben

Vertragsbeginn
keine Angabe
Vertragsende
keine Angabe
Verlängerung
GIZ may optionally commission contract amendments and/or increases based on the criteria in the tender documents to the successful bidder of this tender. For details, please see the terms of reference.
Optionen
keine Angabe
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein

Angebot und Einreichung0 von 8 angegeben

Elektronische Einreichung
keine Angabe
Einreichung über
keine Angabe
Sprache
keine Angabe
Nebenangebote
keine Angabe
Mehrere Hauptangebote
keine Angabe
Bindefrist
keine Angabe
Angebotsöffnung
keine Angabe
Sicherheiten
keine Angabe

Ausführung1 von 4 angegeben

Vertraulichkeit
keine Angabe
E-Rechnung
keine Angabe
Vorbehaltene Ausführung
keine Angabe
EU-Mittel
Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert

Rechtsschutz3 von 3 angegeben

Nachprüfungsstelle
Die Vergabekammern des Bundes, Villemombler Straße 76, 53123 Bonn
Fristen für Nachprüfungsanträge
According to Article 160, Section 3 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition (GWB), application for review is not permissible insofar as 1. the applicant has identified the claimed infringement of the procurement rules before submitting the application for review and has not submitted a co … ganz lesenAccording to Article 160, Section 3 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition (GWB), application for review is not permissible insofar as 1. the applicant has identified the claimed infringement of the procurement rules before submitting the application for review and has not submitted a complaint to the contracting authority within a period of 10 calendar days; the expiry of the period pursuant to Article 134, Section 2 remains unaffected, 2. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that are evident in the tender notice are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for the application or by the deadline for the submission of bids, specified in the tender notice. 3. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that first become evident in the tender documents are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for application or by the deadline for the submission of bids, 4. more than 15 calendar days have expired since receipt of notification from the contracting authority that it is unwilling to redress the complaint. Sentence 1 does not apply in the case of an application to determine the invalidity of the contract in accordance with Article 135, Section 1 (2). Article 134, Section 1, Sentence 2 remains unaffected. According to Article 135 Section 2 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition (GWB) the invalidity pursuant to Section 1 can only be established if it is notified in the review procedure within 30 calendar days of the information of the tenderers and candidates concerned by the contracting authority about the conclusion of the contract, but no later than six months after conclusion of the contract. If the contracting authority has published the contract award in the Official Journal of the European Union, the period for asserting the invalidity of the contract shall end 30 calendar days after publication of the contract award notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Beschaffungsübereinkommen (GPA)
fällt darunter

Zusätzliche Informationen1 von 1 angegeben

Hinweis
Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXR2YYRYYDJ

Bezeichnungen aus den amtlichen eForms-Codelisten (EU und eForms-DE). Maßgeblich sind die Vergabeunterlagen.

Zuschläge

AuftraggeberZur Seite der Vergabestelle

Mehr von Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

Alle 71 offenen Ausschreibungen von Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, dazu Zuschläge und Auftragnehmer

Marktumfeldvon uns ausgewertet

Vergabemeldungen der letzten 24 Monate mit Hauptgegenstand CPV 790 (Dienstleistungen für Unternehmen: Recht, Marketing, Consulting, Einstellungen, Druck und Sicherheit) in Hessen. Abgeleitet aus veröffentlichten Bekanntmachungen, keine amtliche Statistik. Zuschlagswerte unter 1.000 € zählen wir als Platzhalter nicht mit.

56vergebene Aufträge
5,5Angebote je Los im Median (50 Lose mit Angabe)
1,1 Mio. €Zuschlagswert im Median
553.480 € – 1,76 Mio. €mittlere Hälfte, 17 Werte

Mehr Marktdaten, Vergabestellen und offene Ausschreibungen: Architekturleistungen in Hessen (36 offen)

Preise und WettbewerbPremium

Ähnliche offene Ausschreibungen

Quelle: Bekanntmachungsservice des Bundes (oeffentlichevergabe.de), Lizenz CC0. Stand der Daten: 04.11.2026. Maßgeblich ist allein die Originalbekanntmachung. Kennung 893b1315-4e92-4747-a7e1-e7b667da4702.