Zum Inhalt
Menü
vergebenEU-weitBeratung

81314049-Supporting SME in selected African countries to achieve export-relevant product quality certifications

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH · Eschborn, Hessen

Aktenzeichen 81314049veröffentlicht 19.05.2025DienstleistungenOffenes Verfahren

Frist im Verfahrenseit 610 Tagen abgelaufen

Dieses Verfahren ist abgeschlossen oder älter. Die Seite bleibt zur Information erreichbar.

Diese Frist ist vorbei. Das läuft gerade

Offene Ausschreibungen derselben Leistung im Gebiet Main-Taunus-Kreis.

Alle Ausschreibungen: Beratung in Hessen (25 offen)

Geplant · Neuausschreibung möglich

Vertrag endet voraussichtlich am – Neuausschreibung möglich

in 9 Monaten · aus Vertragsdatum und Laufzeit errechnet · Verlängerung möglich (bis zu 2-mal)

Endet ein Vertrag, schreibt die Vergabestelle die Leistung oft neu aus. Merken Sie den Vertrag vor: Wir erinnern Sie per E-Mail vor dem Vertragsende und melden, wenn dieselbe Vergabestelle eine ähnliche Leistung ausschreibt.

Vormerkenmit kostenlosem Konto

Verlängerungen sind nicht eingerechnet. Ob und wann neu ausgeschrieben wird, entscheidet die Vergabestelle. Die Erkennung einer Neuausschreibung ist eine Schätzung. Weitere auslaufende Verträge

Auf einen Blick

Art des Auftrags
Dienstleistungen
Geschätzter Wert
529 Tsd. €
Laufzeit
27 Monatebis zu 2 Verlängerungen
Lose
1
Verfahren
Offenes VerfahrenVgV, EU-weit
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein
Ort der Leistung
Eschborn65760, Main-Taunus-Kreis, Hessen
Einreichung
keine Angabe

Schnellprüfung für Bieter

  • Unterlagen frei zugänglichkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Einreichung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Nebenangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Mehrere Hauptangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Laut Auftraggeber für KMU geeignetkeine Angabe
  • Sicherheiten verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Teilnahme vorbehalten (z. B. Werkstätten)keine Angabe
  • E-Rechnung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Vertraulichkeitserklärung verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Auktionnein
  • Aus EU-Mitteln finanziertnein
  • Wiederkehrender Auftragkeine Angabe

Einordnungvon uns ausgewertet

Wer darf bieten?

Alle interessierten Unternehmen dürfen ein Angebot abgeben.

Wird verhandelt?

Es wird nicht verhandelt. Gewertet wird das Angebot so, wie es eingereicht wurde.

Was jetzt zu tun ist

Kein Angebot mehr möglich. Wer gewonnen hat und wie viele Angebote eingingen, steht unter Zuschläge; für Folgeaufträge lohnt der Blick auf Laufzeit und Vergabestelle.

Das Verfahren ist abgeschlossen; diese Meldung nennt das Ergebnis.

Bei dieser Vergabestelle vergehen von der ersten Meldung bis zum Ergebnis im Mittel 122 Tage (268 Verfahren, 24 Monate).

Sie erhält im Median 3 Angebote je Los (994 Lose mit Angabe).

Die Gewichtung von Preis und Leistung steht nicht in der Bekanntmachung, nur in den Vergabeunterlagen.

Unterlagen schon heruntergeladen? Vergabeunterlagen prüfen (Team): Fristen, Gewichtung, Mengen, Zertifikate und Fehler im Preisblatt.

Fristen und TermineStand 07.11.2026

  1. Veröffentlichung
    vor 18 Monaten
  2. Heute

Beschreibung

Brief description of the project:

Supporting SME in selected African countries to achieve export-relevant product quality certifications. On behalf of the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, BMZ), the Alliance for Product Quality in Africa is implemented jointly by GIZ and the National Metrology Institute of Germany (Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, PTB). The GIZ modules separate into a global project financed by the Special Initiative Decent Work for a Just Transition (Invest for Jobs) that focusses on inter-continental trade and an AfCFTA module focussing on regional trade within Africa. This assignment focuses on the Invest for Jobs module (hereinafter referred as "the Alliance"). The Alliance is a multi-stakeholder partnership supported by German development cooperation, specialized institutions of quality infrastructure, and the private sector. Measures are implemented in partner countries of the Special Initiative: Egypt, Ethiopia, Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, Morocco, Rwanda, Tunisia, and Senegal. The focus is on African and European companies, their investments, and the associated creation of jobs. Exporting African companies" must meet expectations of buyers in the world"s and specifically EU markets, and thus, products must meet a range of quality requirements and expectations. These include binding, legal product regulations (technical regulations), voluntary technical standards of official standardization bodies, and quality and sustainability standards of private organizations. The verification of compliance with these requirements follows prescribed procedures, which leads to certification. Companies in Africa are often unable to produce products of the required quality and/or provide proof of conformity with existing regulations and standards. This restricts trade with buyers in Europe and prevents the development of a supply industry. The low quality of products hampers higher local value creation and participation in global value chains in African partner countries. Certification, however, leads to international acceptance, is a proof of internationally recognized management systems, and thus builds trust amongst international buyers. The Alliance for Product Quality in Africa seeks to improve the quality of products from African partner countries through certification, so that they comply with the demands of international buyers. That way, exports can be increased, and value chains expanded, leading to economic growth and job creation. The project contributes to employment creation and improvement in the partner countries by strengthening the competitiveness of African manufacturing companies through improved product quality and the removal of other barriers to trade and investment. This includes capacity building of company personnel as much as the capacity to install and maintain standards of production or products. It makes direct contributions to the key indicators of the Special Initiative "Decent Work for a Just Transition", particularly in the areas of better jobs, employability, cooperation with companies and investors, sustainability, and better framework conditions.

Beschreibung des Loses

Services to be provided by the contractor:

The Alliance for Product Quality in Africa ("the Alliance") has the following objective: "Product quality has increased in selected economic sectors and locations in Africa." At the core of the project is the direct hands-on support to companies in Africa (commercial farms, individual farmers and farmer cooperatives, commercial manufacturers of finished products or ingredients) to achieve export-relevant certifications. The primary intended impact is to strengthen Africa´s position on export markets. Being part of the German government´s Special Initiative "Decent Work for a Just Transition" (also called: Invest for Jobs), the Alliance also aims at fostering good employment. Hence the importance of certifications that document an improvement of working conditions in the production processes. The Alliance has been carrying out this work since 2020, gathering substantial experience with the implementation. Cooperation and liaison with other projects of Invest for Jobs and related topics in the partner countries also helps in optimizing the effectiveness and efficiency of the work.

The contractor will contribute to the objectives of the Alliance by implementing two work packages. Work package 1 is called "Supporting African companies to achieve certifications" and its main achievement indicator is: "26 supported African companies in at least three of eight Invest for Jobs partner countries have each received at least one certificate of conformity with private standards (e.g. EU-organic, Fairtrade, GLOBALG.A.P., GOTS, COSMOS, of which at least 20 companies obtained certificates that contain requirements on improving the working conditions or on increasing the income of workers/smallholder farmers, reaching a total of 4000 workers/smallholder farmers (certificates must have concrete criteria concerning the improvement of working conditions or higher incomes, e.g. Fairtrade, Fair for Life, Naturland Fair, Demeter, GLOBALG.A.P., GLOBALG.A.P.-GRASP, Rainforest Alliance, ROC, GOTS, WRAP)." To this end, the contractor shall implement the following steps: (1) Organize calls for applications in the focus countries in order to select the companies to be supported. Pre-select the companies based on the applications and validate the pre-selection with the Alliance team. (2) Conduct on-site visits of the companies for fact-checking, validation of the selection, and first diagnosis. (3) Check compliance with ILO Core Labour Standards (4) Facilitate the signing of cooperation agreements between the companies and GIZ. (5) Establish a workplan with each company and conduct group and individual trainings as needed. (6) Organize a qualified mock audit and provide assistance to the companies concerning the non-conformities and organize the official audit with independent Certification Bodies and accompany the supported companies through the certification process. (7) Support the companies to follow up with the external audit and address eventual non-conformities (8) Provide monitoring and other reports to the Alliance team.

Work package 2 is called "Trainings on quality management". It is mostly a pre-requisit for successfully implementing work package 1, but nonetheless its achievement is monitored on its own. The indicator measuring its successful implementation is: "250 out of 350 employees of African companies/agricultural enterprises involved in quality management, 175 of them women, who participated in qualification measures on quality requirements demanded by European buyers, confirm the relevance of the contents taught for their work and that they have contributed to improving product quality in their companies after their qualification measures.

These activities will initially be implemented in the selected focus countries (Egypt, Ghana, Morocco). In the course of implementation, further activities may be implemented in the other partner countries of Invest for Jobs. The contractor is free to decide how many companies are supported in which countries, in which sectors the companies operate and which standards are supported (taking into account the conditions specified in the indicator). However, it is important here that the companies export or intend to export and therefore also strive for conformity with standards that are in demand on the international market. Also, at least one call for applications shall be carried out in each of the focus countries.

Implementation should be carried out in close coordination with the Alliance team, but the contractor retains sufficient freedom to introduce its own innovative approaches and ideas that support the economic implementation of the activities. The main focus here is on approaches and methods for selection of the companies and implementing the support, training and coaching. The Alliance expects the contractor to design the project implementation in a way that documentation, training and other necessary adjustments within the companies to achieve conformity with international private standards be carried out as effectively as possible, while at the same time guaranteeing the sustainability of the measures.

Bedingungen

Zuschlag3 von 3 angegeben

Preis
PriceGewichtung (Punkte, genau) 30Consideration of the price through the valuation method "tenderfile_valuation_giz_label"
Qualität
Total number of points achieved according to technical assessment (incl. minimum criteria)Gewichtung (Punkte, genau) 70Tenders are first rated on their technical merits in accordance with the technical assessment grid for offers specified in the tender documentation. Once the tenders have been evaluated in this way, only technical bids awarded 500 points or more will be included in the evaluation of financial bids. Technical bids that fail to reach this cut-off point will be regarded as unsuitable. The technical bid is weighted at T: 70%, the financial bid at F: 30%. Set budgets items stated in the tender documents for the financial bid are not part of the evaluation and weighting of the financial bids. Weighting is based on the formula according to Section 9 "Award criteria and the evaluation of tenders" of the Terms and conditions for application (please refer to the published tender documents).
Qualität
Total number of points achieved according to technical assessment (incl. minimum criteria)Tenders are first rated on their technical merits in accordance with the technical assessment grid for offers specified in the tender documentation. Once the tenders have been evaluated in this way, only technical bids awarded 500 points or more will be included in the evaluation of financial bids. Technical bids that fail to reach this cut-off point will be regarded as unsuitable. The technical bid is weighted at T: 70%, the financial bid at F: 30%. Set budgets items stated in the tender documents for the financial bid are not part of the evaluation and weighting of the financial bids. Weighting is based on the formula according to Section 9 "Award criteria and the evaluation of tenders" of the Terms and conditions for application (please refer to the published tender documents).

Eignung0 von 2 angegeben

Kriterien
keine Angabe
Nachreichen von Unterlagen
keine Angabe

Laufzeit und Umfang4 von 6 angegeben

Vertragsbeginn
keine Angabe
Vertragsende
keine Angabe
Dauer
27 Monate
Verlängerung
bis zu 2-mal: GIZ may optionally commission contract amendments and/or increases based on the criteria in the tender documents to the successful bidder of this tender. For details, please see the terms of reference.
Optionen
GIZ may optionally commission contract amendments and/or increases based on the criteria in the tender documents to the successful bidder of this tender. For details, please see the terms of reference.
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein

Angebot und Einreichung0 von 8 angegeben

Elektronische Einreichung
keine Angabe
Einreichung über
keine Angabe
Sprache
keine Angabe
Nebenangebote
keine Angabe
Mehrere Hauptangebote
keine Angabe
Bindefrist
keine Angabe
Angebotsöffnung
keine Angabe
Sicherheiten
keine Angabe

Ausführung2 von 5 angegeben

Vertraulichkeit
keine Angabe
E-Rechnung
keine Angabe
Vorbehaltene Ausführung
keine Angabe
Strategische Beschaffung
Verringerung der Auswirkungen auf die Umwelt, Erfüllung sozialer Zielsetzungen
EU-Mittel
Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert

Rechtsschutz3 von 3 angegeben

Nachprüfungsstelle
Die Vergabekammern des Bundes, Villemombler Straße 76, 53123 Bonn
Fristen für Nachprüfungsanträge
According to Article 160, Section 3 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition (GWB), application for review is not permissible insofar as 1. the applicant has identified the claimed infringement of the procurement rules before submitting the application for review and has not submitted a co … ganz lesenAccording to Article 160, Section 3 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition (GWB), application for review is not permissible insofar as 1. the applicant has identified the claimed infringement of the procurement rules before submitting the application for review and has not submitted a complaint to the contracting authority within a period of 10 calendar days; the expiry of the period pursuant to Article 134, Section 2 remains unaffected, 2. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that are evident in the tender notice are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for the application or by the deadline for the submission of bids, specified in the tender notice. 3. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that first become evident in the tender documents are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for application or by the deadline for the submission of bids, 4. more than 15 calendar days have expired since receipt of notification from the contracting authority that it is unwilling to redress the complaint. Sentence 1 does not apply in the case of an application to determine the invalidity of the contract in accordance with Article 135, Section 1 (2). Article 134, Section 1, Sentence 2 remains unaffected. According to Article 160, Section 3 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition (GWB), application for review is not permissible insofar as 1. the applicant has identified the claimed infringement of the procurement rules before submitting the application for review and has not submitted a complaint to the contracting authority within a period of 10 calendar days; the expiry of the period pursuant to Article 134, Section 2 remains unaffected, 2. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that are evident in the tender notice are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for the application or by the deadline for the submission of bids, specified in the tender notice. 3. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that first become evident in the tender documents are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for application or by the deadline for the submission of bids, 4. more than 15 calendar days have expired since receipt of notification from the contracting authority that it is unwilling to redress the complaint. Sentence 1 does not apply in the case of an application to determine the invalidity of the contract in accordance with Article 135, Section 1 (2). Article 134, Section 1, Sentence 2 remains unaffected.
Beschaffungsübereinkommen (GPA)
fällt darunter

Zusätzliche Informationen1 von 1 angegeben

Hinweis
Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXTRYY6YTECVV3GV Communication / questions can only be submitted in English using GIZ's eProcurement Tender Platform for the award of contracts.

Bezeichnungen aus den amtlichen eForms-Codelisten (EU und eForms-DE). Maßgeblich sind die Vergabeunterlagen.

Zuschläge

Zuschläge je Los
Zuschlag anAngebote
Consortium GOPA AFC GmbH - AFCi Consultants Maroc SARL AU, Bonn4

AuftraggeberZur Seite der Vergabestelle

Mehr von Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

Alle 68 offenen Ausschreibungen von Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, dazu Zuschläge und Auftragnehmer

Marktumfeldvon uns ausgewertet

Vergabemeldungen der letzten 24 Monate mit Hauptgegenstand CPV 790 (Dienstleistungen für Unternehmen: Recht, Marketing, Consulting, Einstellungen, Druck und Sicherheit) in Hessen. Abgeleitet aus veröffentlichten Bekanntmachungen, keine amtliche Statistik. Zuschlagswerte unter 1.000 € zählen wir als Platzhalter nicht mit.

56vergebene Aufträge
5,5Angebote je Los im Median (50 Lose mit Angabe)
1,1 Mio. €Zuschlagswert im Median
553.480 € – 1,76 Mio. €mittlere Hälfte, 17 Werte

Mehr Marktdaten, Vergabestellen und offene Ausschreibungen: Beratung in Hessen (25 offen)

Preise und WettbewerbPremium

Verlauf des Verfahrens2 Meldungen

  1. Vergabebekanntmachung (diese Seite)
  2. BekanntmachungFrist 06.03.2025

Berichtigte Fassungen bleiben aufrufbar. Die Suche zeigt je Verfahren nur die aktuelle.

Ähnliche offene Ausschreibungen

Quelle: Bekanntmachungsservice des Bundes (oeffentlichevergabe.de), Lizenz CC0. Stand der Daten: 04.11.2026. Maßgeblich ist allein die Originalbekanntmachung. Kennung ae3533fa-7f3e-429e-a9c3-9b2d6f31e06b.