Zum Inhalt
Menü
vergebenEU-weitDienstleistungen

81301558-Accompagnement de 8 Communes dans l"augmentation des recettes au Maro

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH · Eschborn, Hessen

Aktenzeichen 81301558-VBveröffentlicht 21.03.2024DienstleistungenOffenes Verfahren

Frist im Verfahrenkeine Angabe

Dieses Verfahren ist abgeschlossen oder älter. Die Seite bleibt zur Information erreichbar.

Bereits vergeben. Das läuft gerade

Offene Ausschreibungen derselben Leistung im Gebiet Main-Taunus-Kreis.

Alle Ausschreibungen: Dienstleistungen in Hessen (152 offen)

Auf einen Blick

Art des Auftrags
Dienstleistungen
Geschätzter Wert
keine Angabe
Laufzeit
keine Angabe
Lose
1
Verfahren
Offenes VerfahrenVgV, EU-weit
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein
Ort der Leistung
Eschborn65760, Main-Taunus-Kreis, Hessen
Einreichung
keine Angabe

Schnellprüfung für Bieter

  • Unterlagen frei zugänglichkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Einreichung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Nebenangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Mehrere Hauptangebote zugelassenkeine Angabe
  • Laut Auftraggeber für KMU geeignetkeine Angabe
  • Sicherheiten verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Teilnahme vorbehalten (z. B. Werkstätten)keine Angabe
  • E-Rechnung verpflichtendkeine Angabe
  • Vertraulichkeitserklärung verlangtkeine Angabe
  • Elektronische Auktionnein
  • Aus EU-Mitteln finanziertnein
  • Wiederkehrender Auftragkeine Angabe

Einordnungvon uns ausgewertet

Wer darf bieten?

Alle interessierten Unternehmen dürfen ein Angebot abgeben.

Wird verhandelt?

Es wird nicht verhandelt. Gewertet wird das Angebot so, wie es eingereicht wurde.

Was jetzt zu tun ist

Kein Angebot mehr möglich. Wer gewonnen hat und wie viele Angebote eingingen, steht unter Zuschläge; für Folgeaufträge lohnt der Blick auf Laufzeit und Vergabestelle.

Das Verfahren ist abgeschlossen; diese Meldung nennt das Ergebnis.

Bei dieser Vergabestelle vergehen von der ersten Meldung bis zum Ergebnis im Mittel 122 Tage (270 Verfahren, 24 Monate).

Sie erhält im Median 3 Angebote je Los (1.003 Lose mit Angabe).

Wertung laut Bekanntmachung: Preis 30 %, Leistung und Qualität 70 %.

  • Preis30 %
  • Qualität70 %

Unterlagen schon heruntergeladen? Vergabeunterlagen prüfen (Team): Fristen, Gewichtung, Mengen, Zertifikate und Fehler im Preisblatt.

Mein Angebot ist% teurer als das günstigste.

Das kostet etwa 5 von 100 Punkten der Gesamtwertung.

Punktverlust je Mehrpreis
10 % teurer−2,7 Punkte
25 % teurer−6 Punkte
50 % teurer−10 Punkte
100 % teurer−15 Punkte

Annahme: Preispunkte = günstigstes Angebot geteilt durch das eigene. Die verbindliche Formel steht in den Vergabeunterlagen.

Fristen und TermineStand 10.11.2026

  1. Veröffentlichung
    vor 32 Monaten
  2. Heute

Beschreibung

The "Good Financial Governance" (BGF) project is focused on improving the good financial governance of local authorities in Morocco with three areas of intervention: mobilizing own-source revenue, budget planning, and budget management. The political partner is the Ministry of the Interior and its directorate-general of local authorities (Direction Générale des collectiviés territoriale - DGCT). It provides technical assistance to 8 municipalities (Marrakech, Safi, Benguerir, Agadir, Taroudant, Inezgane, Guelmim and Sidi Ifni) in three pilot regions: Marrakech-Safi, Souss-Massa and Guelmim-Oued-Noun. The funding for the project is provided by the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), with institutional support from the Moroccan Ministry of the Interior's DGCT. The objective of action area 1 is to increase own source revenue in communes. This can be achieved by improving the understanding by the administration of the tax potential of communes, strengthening communal revenue mobilization plans and supporting the capacity of communes in the realization of those plans. By analyzing fiscal potential and developing resource mobilization plans, municipalities can effectively increase their own-source revenues. Planned activities of action area 1 include conducting fiscal potential analyses, developing resource mobilization plans in consultation with relevant authorities, facilitating multi-stakeholder exchange formats to optimize revenues, providing support for tax reforms through briefings and study tours, facilitating peer-to-peer learning between municipalities on revenue management, and conducting data collection and analysis using a Geographic Information System (GIS). The objective of action area 2 is to improve the conditions for effective budget planning by local authorities. More reliable budgeting will be achieved by including investment costs in budget planning. The aim is to increase transparency and needs-orientation of public budgets, as well as to promote consideration of the specific interests and needs of women and men. It is expected that improved regional budget planning will also enhance the quality of regional planning processes. Planned activities for action area 2 include facilitating international exchanges on best practice with local authorities; advising local authorities on the development and use of easy-to-read presentation formats; training to improve budget literacy, planning and management; and promoting the exchange and networking of communal actors on planning processes and rules. In addition, support will be provided to the DGCT in developing a methodology and digital tools for integrating post-investment costs into medium-term financial planning and regional development planning. The objective of action area 3 is to provide budget management tools for local authorities, which can include key performance indicators (KPIs), exchange formats, and methodologies for evaluating fixed assets. The hypothesis is that if these tools are available, they will be used by municipalities and regions to optimize budget management and promote sound financial management. Planned activities for action area 3 intend to support local authorities in implementing these tools. This includes supporting the development and piloting of a methodology for identifying and evaluating fixed assets, as well as the use of KPIs for benchmarking purposes. The action area also aims to facilitate inter-regional and inter-municipal exchange to promote best practices among local authorities and promotes communal exchange formats between Moroccan and European communes on asset recording standards and accrual accounting methods. The action area also focuses on analyzing the bottlenecks in public investment and budget management, such as issues related to digitalization, standards, procedures, and control mechanisms.

Beschreibung des Loses

The "Good Financial Governance" (BGF) project is improving good financial governance of local authorities in Morocco with three areas of intervention: mobilizing own-source revenue, budget planning, and budget management. The project partner is the Ministry of the interior and its directorate-general of local authorities (Direction Générale des collectiviés territoriale - DGCT). It provides technical assistance and capacity building to 8 communes (Marrakech, Safi, Benguerir, Agadir, Taroudant, Inezgane, Guelmim and Sidi Ifni) in three pilot regions: Marrakech-Safi, Souss-Massa and Guelmim-Oued-Noun. The intervention of the contractor in the framework of this call for tender covers the provision of: - Expertise to update and implement resource mobilization plans for 8 Communes in Morocco (output 1) - Capitalization of best practices and communication for outputs 1-3 The consulting team will be composed of 3 long-term experts and a pool of short term experts Work package 1 is focused on providing expertise to realize activities and the indicators of output 1 of the project, mainly in the domain of updating and implement resource mobilization plans for 8 selected communes (Marrakech, Safi, Benguerir, Agadir, Taroudant, Inezgane, Guelmim and Sidi Ifni). GIZ, responsible for this work package, will conduct analyses of the fiscal potential of each commune. For larger communes like Agadir and Marrakech, more in-depth approaches will be used, while a rapid approach will be taken for medium-sized and small communes. The mobilization plans will be drafted in collaboration with the communes based on the available analyses and the goals set out in the Communal Action Plans (PACs). The contractor for this project has several tasks. They need to create a tax potential analysis guide based on the fiscal potential analysis realized by GIZ. They will also develop a resource mobilization plan for each of the 8 communes. The implementation of the measures identified in the plans will also be supported by the contractor. The measures to be implemented can be categorized into two groups. The first includes measures related to taxes managed by the communes themselves, such as support for broadening the tax base and optimizing the collection of taxes like the tax on undeveloped urban land and local taxes. The second group of measures relates to local taxes managed by the Treasury (TGR) and the General Tax Directorate (DGI), such as broadening the tax base for taxes such as the "taxe professionnelle", tax on communal services, and "taxe d'habitation". The contractor will also support the use and optimization of digital tools for revenue management across all communes. Regular exchanges will occur between the contractor and the GIZ technical advisor responsible for output 1. The DGCT, the political partner in the project, aims to utilize the experiences and tools developed in this project to benefit other local authorities in the future. Work Package 2 focuses on providing short term expertise support for Outputs 1-3 of the project, The contractor has two main responsibilities: supporting the achievement of the objectives and indicators for Output 1 and providing expertise for specific tasks related to Outputs 2 and 3 as requested by GIZ technical advisors based in Rabat. - For Output 1, the contractor will primarily assist long-term experts in the 8 Communes. This includes tasks such as developing resource mobilization plans, mapping properties using a geographic information system (GIS), facilitating the use of the TARGA tool by local authorities, and identifying undeclared taxpayers. The contractor will also support Communes in updating their databases to include all residential properties and their owners, as well as analyze the functionalities of the GIR IT tool. Under the responsibility of the GIZ technical advisor, the contractor will also contribute to national-level discussions on local tax reform. The work plan envisages utilizing various profiles in relation to these tasks. - Regarding Output 2, short-term experts will be mobilized to support the design of a training-action program on budget analysis for communes and regions, integrating gender aspects into budget programming, conducting comparative studies on the impact of integrating or not integrating the full costs of an investment project, developing communication strategies for local authorities, and designing exchange formats for alternative financing experiences. - As part of Output 3, the contractor will collaborate with the DGCT and pilot communes to develop a Key Performance Indicators (KPI) reference system, assist in the creation of a database based on PAPC figures, identify best-practice KPIs, and support the preparation of consistency summaries and inventories in six communes. These assignments will be carried out based on Terms of References (ToRs) provided by the project's team of GIZ technical advisors. Additional subjects may be added depending on the progress of the work and in consultation with the local authorities and the DGCT. Work package 3 aims to communicate on and capitalize on existing best practices within Moroccan local authorities and those developed with the support of the good financial governance project. Indicator 3 of the project seeks to share the tools and experiences developed under output 3, with the goal of integrating sharing and up-scaling aspects into all project outputs. The objective is to develop tools that make existing good practices and experiences in the Moroccan system more accessible. The best practices to be diffused will be identified by the GIZ team, the project's pilot local authorities, and the DGCT. Dissemination products will be chosen based on each practice, with the possibility of proposing standard diffusion products or developing products specific to each case. Digital tools are preferred for the exploitation of best practices, such as documentation that can be accessed on websites.

Bedingungen

Zuschlag2 von 2 angegeben

Preis
Gewichtung (Punkte, genau) 30
Qualität
Gewichtung (Punkte, genau) 70

Eignung0 von 2 angegeben

Kriterien
keine Angabe
Nachreichen von Unterlagen
keine Angabe

Laufzeit und Umfang2 von 5 angegeben

Vertragsbeginn
keine Angabe
Vertragsende
keine Angabe
Verlängerung
keine Angabe
Optionen
GIZ may optionally commission contract amendments and/or increases based on the criteria in the tender documents to the successful bidder of this tender. For details, please see the terms of reference.
Rahmenvereinbarung
nein

Angebot und Einreichung0 von 8 angegeben

Elektronische Einreichung
keine Angabe
Einreichung über
keine Angabe
Sprache
keine Angabe
Nebenangebote
keine Angabe
Mehrere Hauptangebote
keine Angabe
Bindefrist
keine Angabe
Angebotsöffnung
keine Angabe
Sicherheiten
keine Angabe

Ausführung1 von 4 angegeben

Vertraulichkeit
keine Angabe
E-Rechnung
keine Angabe
Vorbehaltene Ausführung
keine Angabe
EU-Mittel
Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert

Rechtsschutz3 von 3 angegeben

Nachprüfungsstelle
Die Vergabekammern des Bundes, 53113 Bonn
Fristen für Nachprüfungsanträge
According to Article 160, Section 3 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition (GWB), application for review is not permissible insofar as 1. the applicant has identified the claimed infringement of the procurement rules before submitting the application for review and has not submitted a co … ganz lesenAccording to Article 160, Section 3 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition (GWB), application for review is not permissible insofar as 1. the applicant has identified the claimed infringement of the procurement rules before submitting the application for review and has not submitted a complaint to the contracting authority within a period of 10 calendar days; the expiry of the period pursuant to Article 134, Section 2 remains unaffected, 2. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that are evident in the tender notice are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for the application or by the deadline for the submission of bids, specified in the tender notice. 3. complaints of infringements of procurement rules that first become evident in the tender documents are not submitted to the contracting authority at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for application or by the deadline for the submission of bids, 4. more than 15 calendar days have expired since receipt of notification from the contracting authority that it is unwilling to redress the complaint. Sentence 1 does not apply in the case of an application to determine the invalidity of the contract in accordance with Article 135, Section 1 (2). Article 134, Section 1, Sentence 2 remains unaffected.
Beschaffungsübereinkommen (GPA)
fällt darunter

Zusätzliche Informationen1 von 1 angegeben

Hinweis
Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXR2YYRYYRT All communication takes place in English via communication tool in the project area of the procurement portal.

Bezeichnungen aus den amtlichen eForms-Codelisten (EU und eForms-DE). Maßgeblich sind die Vergabeunterlagen.

Zuschläge

Zuschläge je Los
Zuschlag anAngebote
Consortium GOPA Worldwide Consultants GmbH - AFCi Consultants Maroc, Bad Homburg4

AuftraggeberZur Seite der Vergabestelle

Mehr von Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

Alle 65 offenen Ausschreibungen von Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, dazu Zuschläge und Auftragnehmer

Marktumfeldvon uns ausgewertet

Vergabemeldungen der letzten 24 Monate mit Hauptgegenstand CPV 752 (Kommunale Dienstleistungen) in Hessen. Abgeleitet aus veröffentlichten Bekanntmachungen, keine amtliche Statistik. Zuschlagswerte unter 1.000 € zählen wir als Platzhalter nicht mit.

61vergebene Aufträge
4Angebote je Los im Median (57 Lose mit Angabe)
634.925 €Zuschlagswert im Median
396.013 € – 901.735 €mittlere Hälfte, 50 Werte

Mehr Marktdaten, Vergabestellen und offene Ausschreibungen: Dienstleistungen in Hessen (152 offen)

Häufige Zuschlagsempfänger

Preise und WettbewerbPremium

Ähnliche offene Ausschreibungen

Quelle: Bekanntmachungsservice des Bundes (oeffentlichevergabe.de), Lizenz CC0. Stand der Daten: 04.11.2026. Maßgeblich ist allein die Originalbekanntmachung. Kennung 77ad632f-9637-48c5-bcd0-b93ab6ada5ce.